
Obama’s top science and technology advisor John P. Holdren has been forced to issue a statement in which he denies advocating the totalitarian population control proposals outlined in his own academic textbook. However, Holdren’s response is a tissue of half-truths, spin and outright lies.
The controversy began this past weekend when fresh attention was given to passages from the 1977 book Ecoscience, which Holdren Co-authored with close colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich, leading to accusations that Holdren supported the numerous eugenicist policies outlined in the book.
“This material is from a three-decade-old, three-author college textbook. Dr. Holdren addressed this issue during his confirmation when he said he does not believe that determining optimal population is a proper role of government. Dr. Holdren is not and never has been an advocate for policies of forced sterilization,” reads a statement provided by Holdren’s staff.
A statement from Holdren’s co-authors the Ehrlichs was also released by the White House which read, “Anybody who actually wants to know what we and/or Professor Holdren believe and recommend about these matters would presumably read some of the dozens of publications that we and he separately have produced in more recent times, rather than going back a third of a century to find some formulations in an encyclopedic textbook where description can be misrepresented as endorsement.”
So. Man A alleges that Man B is a eugenicist. Man B issues statement denying allegation.
One of the men is telling the truth. Which one?
Stand-up is the funnest job in the world. I have no one to answer to but myself. And I get to cover whatever I want. I fancy myself, in part, Quincy with Dick Jokes. Or perhaps Kolchak from that Night Stalker show in the seventies. He was a reporter who always seemed to get assigned the weirdest cases, like chasing vampires or whatever other strange thing.
Part of what I do is Kolchak stuff: I get dumped into some weird environment about which I know nothing, and by the end of the show I have to figure it all out and type up my story.
So part of what you see me do here is talking to myself. If this were a real club we were gathered at, this would be the audience participation part of the show where I would entertain shouts from the audience, from those who may know something I don't.
But I can't hear your shouts. So I have to go it alone. When I pronounce a thing to be so, what I'm really doing is speaking to myself and arranging pieces of information in my mind. If I were a criminal investigator --which, by the way, I think would be the second funnest job in the world, the fun part not being that people got killed but that you get to figure out puzzles-- I would liken what I sometimes do to writing data on individual post-it notes and arranging them on the wall and trying to figure out relationships between them.
That I say a thing once in the course of a criminal investigation means little. That I say it repeatedly and with ever-increasing fineness of detail means that I am very sure of it.
As a criminal investigator, words mean nothing to me. I am not in the habit of believing what people tell me.
So Holdren's words mean nothing to me. And that the White House issues a denial on his behalf means nothing to me. The word of a government agent has no value.
Instead, I must try to illuminate the context within which the allegation and the denial are made.
We know that Holdren has done academic work on eugenics. We know that. He co-wrote a book on it. But that was thirty years ago. The statements issued on his behalf seem to imply that that's all just water under the bridge as the book was published such a long, long time ago and that he's moved on.
Does a person who's moved on rummage through his book collection to find his precious and display it prominently on the shelf behind him --helpfully laid down so that we can read the Ecoscience title-- displayed during an interview with AP?
The interview is about "global warming" and injecting aerosols into the upper atmosphere to dim the planet. Creepy stuff, especially since all the planets are warming. Or maybe they're cooling now; who knows. (Cap and trade is a scam. It's a tax on life, payable to bankers.)
But at any rate, Holdren seems not to mind the continued association with his masterwork.
But maybe he didn't actually endorse any of the stuff in the book. Maybe it was just a summer job, back when he was a fresh-faced young man with a newly-minted degree that he proudly displayed on his wall at the dorm about how smart he is, which he WAS NOT, just like any number of the little egghead FREAKS one would see at college who dream of somehow shaping society to fit their deranged views of it.
If you WANT to write a book on forced sterilizations and forcibly taking babies from mothers and who knows what all else, you are a control freak NUTJOB who should, at no time, be permitted anywhere near the levers of power.
Here's just a couple more of his filth nuggets:
“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a
suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for
involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very
difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the
technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear
to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have
to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective,
despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite
varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must
be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no
effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or
livestock.”
...
“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.
The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that
could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired
opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The
capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with
official permission, for a limited number of births.”
...
“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.”
“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for
determining the optimum population for the world and for each region
and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional
limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of
each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the
agreed limits.”
For someone who just had a summer job and who doesn't actually believe any of that kookie stuff, he seems to speak rather lovingly of "Planetary Regimes" with "power to enforce" capsules implanted at puberty, removable upon receiving "official permission" for a limited number of births.
So, yes, it all reads like an endorsement and he seems to trumpet a continued association with his brainchild masterpiece by placing it in the shot during his interview. Two data points indicating that he is a eugenicist.
Incidentally, I'm not sure what dreamland reality this beast lives in. In no way do I require official permission to have children.
And I will remind you that institutionalized forced sterilization is regarded as a crime against humanity. That the Obama Administration would provide a post for a eugenicist is in perfecting keeping with its running interference for known, confessed war criminals.
So we've got three data points:
- He wrote lovingly of Planetary Regimes and such, indicating that he fully endorsed the idea thirty years ago --rather than the book's writing being simply a summer job for him,
- He proudly displays his precious on the shelf, indicating his continued endorsement of it, and
- He works for a known protector of war criminals whose crimes fit into the same category of crimes against humanity as does forced sterilization. Birds of a feather flock together.
One, two, three. That's enough for me. The man is a card-carrying eugenicist, occupying a post at the highest levels at your government.
But why would the bankers who purchased the United States so long ago install a eugenicist? Are they, too, eugenicists? What are they up to? What's their ethos?
You know that I like to pay attention to graffiti as I walk down alleys. The Federal Reserve Note is a privately owned and issued currency, owned by those bankers who own the Federal Reserve System. Is there any graffiti on the Federal Reserve Note? Let's take a look:
"In God We Trust," eh? Who is 'we' and what god are we talking about? The god is Moloch, shown here peeking out ever so cutely:
Some would say, "Chris, that's just a mistake or a funny joke that the artist snuck in there."
Uh uh. Mistakes in print-ready currency plates do not occur. And funny little jokes do not long remain. That owl is there for a reason. What does that owl mean? Well, Moloch is often represented as an owl. Moloch is the god of idolatrous Jews.
Molech, whose name probably derived from Melech "king" and Bosheth, "shame", was one of the deities worshipped by the idolatrous Israelites. He was referred to as "the abomination of the children of Ammon" (1 Kings 11:7) and the primary means of worshipping him appears to be child sacrifice or "to pass through the fire." Solomon was said to have built a temple to him.
"Then did Solomon build an high place for Chemosh, the abomination of Moab, in the hill that is before Jerusalem, and for Molech, the abomination of the children of Ammon." (1 Kings 11:7)
Sacrificing children was not uncommon, but the practice died down around the time of Jeremiah when the King defiled Tophet, the place where Moloch was worshipped.
http://www.deliriumsrealm.com/delirium/articleview.asp?Post=300
Milton didn't much seem to care for him. He writes in Paradise Lost:
"First, Moloch, horrid King, besmeared with blood
Of human sacrifice, and parents' tears;
Though, for the noise of drums and timbrels loud,
Their children's cries unheard that passed through fire
To his grim idol. Him the Ammonite
Worshiped in Rabba and her watery plain,
In Argob and in Basan, to the stream
Of utmost Arnon. Nor content with such
Audacious neighbourhood, the wisest heart
Of Solomon he led by fraud to build
His temple right against the temple of God
On that opprobrious hill, and made his grove
The pleasant valley of Hinnom, Tophet thence
And black Gehenna called, the type of Hell."
- Paradise Lost, i. 391-405
Moloch may also be represented as a Bull:
But I think bankers prefer the owl:
Moloch is the god to whom idolatrous Israelites made human sacrifices. Why, Solomon even built a temple for him. The Seal of Solomon --sometimes erroneously called the Star of David-- is the six-pointed star.
One of the
most popular, if not the most popular symbol of the Jewish people is
the legendary Star of David also known as the Shield of David. It is a
six pointed star known as a hexagram and is usually depicted as blue.
Most
modern Jews willfully use the Star of David as a symbol of Jewish pride
and pride in the Jewish nation, Israel. In fact, the Star of David is
depicted on the flag of Israel.
But, what is the true history behind this famous star, the hexagram?
The
truth is, the hexagram was not a symbol the original Israelites used.
In fact, they would have shunned the six pointed star because of its
pagan use and its use in witchcraft. Wiccans and witches use the symbol
in magic practices and for spells, modernly and anciently. The ancient
Egyptians and Assyrians even worshiped the Six Pointed Star as an idol
for their gods and in Greece was a symbol of Saturn.
But
it is known that ancient Israelites did use the star of David and was
even used in the days of Messiah. However, it was not a dominant symbol
of Israel. Instead, the Menorah was the dominant symbol used for Israel
and God. The Star of David however was used by the ancient kabbalists,
or Jewish Magicians.
But why?
First
lets skip forward in time. The followers of Messiah hardly recognized
the Star of David as a dominant symbol, or any ordinary Israelite, as a
symbol of God. They knew its history and where it came from. After the
destruction of the Temple and the Nation of Israel, only Kabbalists
used the symbol but no ordinary Hebrew who worshiped YHWH according to
Scripture, but avoided the symbol. Why is it now a dominant symbol of
not on all Jewish people, but even the Nation of Israel? It was not
originally given to them by free will or for honor and pride, but the
exact opposite. To shame them, and bring disgrace to their name and
Gods. The one man who would make the Jews identified by the Six Pointed
Star was Adolf Hitler.
http://www.yahfollower.com/thestarofdavid.htm
The Seal of Solomon --the "Star of David"-- was applied to Jews in Nazi camps by those familiar with the occult meaning of the symbol. That seal was a flag, in a true martial sense, applied to those who were being claimed as the property of those who worship Moloch. The ignorami were claimed by what I call "the other brother."
The Holocaust was a simple pagan human sacrifice. The word "holocaust" means "burnt offering." Flames. Sacrifice. The event was not at all noteworthy, otherwise. Incidentally, the Holocaust Museum is not a memorial. It is a monument, a celebration commemorating that historic offering to Moloch, an offering which would provide the perceived moral authority for the occupation of Jerusalem by the worshipers of Moloch. Very few Jews who pass through the doors of that "museum" are aware that they are being tricked into delivering psychic energy to the pagan sect which orchestrated the sacrifice. They are being tricked into "intending upon" those deaths. They are being tricked into celebrating those deaths. The Holocaust Museum needs to be demolished as an affront to the memories of the dead.
But back to the dollar bill:
We see a few things: "Novus ordo seclorum." New Order of the Ages. New World Order. Various political figures have publicly proclaimed allegiance to the New World Order, including Hitler, both George Bushes, Henry Kissinger, and Barack Obama.
Birds of a feather flock together.
Hitler was an employee of the New World Order. He knew where his bread was buttered. He was a very dutiful avenging angel who did his part to glorify Moloch by lopping off diseased limbs. He was a swell guy.
So we see that the owners of the Federal Reserve love Moloch, the god to whom human sacrifices are made. And by way of the Bank of England, the Rothschild Family, and the Rockefeller family, these owners of the Federal Reserve hired Adolph Hitler to preside over their eugenics operation.
And since these bankers hired the CIA, Mossad, and the Pentagon to provide the casus legislationi for expanding United States' police powers to include spiriting people off to nowhere and other sundry police state powers, might we expect them to launch another eugenics operation with their newfound control grid and all those guys with guns on the street corner?
I would certainly imagine so.
Quotes from David Rockefeller's Memoirs (Random House, New York, 2002) Chapter 27, pages 404 and 405. Cited by Dr. Dennis Cuddy:
"My lifetime pursuits as an internationalist might best be summarized by one rather extraordinary day in 1995. October 23 was a busy day at the Council on Foreign Relations. The fiftieth anniversary of the United Nations had drawn almost two hundred heads of government to New York, and many had asked to speak at the Council. but even then the day was unusual for the diversity of the speakers: Jiang Zemin, president of the People's Republic of China and heir apparent to Deng Xiaoping; Vaclav Havel of the Czech Republic... Yasser Arafat... and, finally, Fidel Castro.... With the exception of Havel, these men had vowed to fight to the death against imperialist America. Now, with the end of the Cold War, they flocked to the center of world capitalism, eager to meet and close deals with American bankers and corporate executives, or at least to be seen with them -- even Castro....
...
1930-33. Hitler came to power and delegated Rudin to direct the Racial Hygiene Society, which called for sterilization or death of people considered "racially impure." The Rockefeller Foundation funded an anthropological survey of the eugenically correct population by Nazi eugenicists Rudin and others. 4?
1939. Rockefeller Foundation helps launch the School-Health Coordinating Service.2 Cuddy 22
1940s. "Otmar Verschuer and his assistant Dr. Joseph Mengele together wrote reports for special courts, which enforced Rudin's racial purity law against the illegal cohabitation of Aryans and non-Aryans. In the early 1940s, a large factory was built "at Auschwitz... to utilize the Standard Oil IG Farbin patents with concentration camp slave labor to make gasoline from coal. The SS guarded the Jewish and other inmates and selected for killing those who were unfit for IG Farbin slave labor.... Standard Oil and German President Emil Heilfeck testified after the war at the Nuremberg Trial that Standard Oil funds [Rockefeller]helped pay for the SS guards at Auschwitz. The Rockefeller Foundation defends its record by claiming that its funding of Nazi Germany programs during World War II was limited to psychiatric research." 4
1943: The Rockefeller Foundation helped fund the Allen Memorial Institute at McGill University in Montreal. Working with the Canadian military and the Office of Strategic Services (The OSS became the CIA in 1947), Dr. Cameron conducted torturous experiments on human guinea pigs in order to perfect the various mind control techniques. These brainwashing tactics included coercive interrogation, psychosurgery, drugs, hypnosis and "between 30 to 60 electroshocks over a short period" along with powerful tranquilizers to control anxiety. Cameron's justification: his patients, "like prisoners of Communists, tended to resist and had to be broken down." This is described in the 1989 book, Journey Into Madness: The True Story of Secret CIA Mind Control and Medical Abuse
1943. Joseph Mengele appointed medical commandant of the Auschwitz concentration camp.
1946 or 1947. (Both dates have been cited) Tavistock Institute of Human Relations is formed as an independent not-for-profit organization -- with a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation, which "was interested in seeing if the kind of social psychiatry that had been developed during World War II could be relevant for the civilian society."
It would own the journal Human Relations. "Canadian-born psychologist and social analyst Elliott Jacques.... was the man who first identified the midlife crisis... Jaques was... a founder member of the Tavistock Institute." 9 http://education.guardian.co.uk/obituary/story/0,12212,934548,00.html
http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/brainwashing/rockefeller-mind-control.htm
Chart 1 reveals the linear connection between the Rothschilds and the Bank of England, and the London banking houses which ultimately control the Federal Reserve Banks through their stockholdings of bank stock and their subsidiary firms in New York. The two principal Rothschild representatives in New York, J. P. Morgan Co., and Kuhn,Loeb & Co. were the firms which set up the Jekyll Island Conference at which the Federal Reserve Act was drafted, who directed the subsequent successful campaign to have the plan enacted into law by Congress, and who purchased the controlling amounts of stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 1914. These firms had their principal officers appointed to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Advisory Council in 1914. In 1914 a few families (blood or business related) owning controlling stock in existing banks (such as in New York City) caused those banks to purchase controlling shares in the Federal Reserve regional banks. Examination of the charts and text in the House Banking Committee Staff Report of August, 1976 and the current stockholders list of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks show this same family control.
So. We know that the bankers who purchased ProductName 9/11 also hired Hitler. They hired him to execute their eugenics program. These bankers worship Moloch. Moloch is the god to whom human sacrifices are made. I think it is entirely reasonable that we may expect another eugenics operation here in the United States, along with the attendant human sacrifices, i.e., exterminations. In
light of all this, I know beyond the shadow of a doubt that Holdren is
not only a card-carrying eugenicist, but that he was hired expressly
for the purpose of presiding over a massive American population
reduction and experimentation scheme. If
you are an American Jew, I'd get fitted for your Seal of Solomon badge,
because there are some very powerful Jewish bankers in this world who
absolutely despise you for rejecting the authority of the Talmud. It is
a religious imperative to them that you be put to death. And
since 9-11 has nothing but Israeli fingerprints all over it, it will be
supremely easy for these bankers to whip Johnny Dirtyfoot into a
Jew-hating frenzy.
http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/whofed.html
You know that, right?
...which was these bankers' plan all along.
You got tricked. By the other ones...


