Christopher King

I, uh, I actually need to go on vacation.

I've aged ten years in the past five. I have various physical, emotional, and mental pains. I need to figure out what to do about the house. I need to leave and live in a cabin in the woods for a time. I need to figure out what I am supposed to do, who I am supposed to be. I am very sad and I am very tired, and I need to go away somewhere.

This is a good time to put this show on hiatus, as the internet at the house has been shut off anyway.

Keep my place at the table? I'll be back someday.

Love you all, without a single exception,
Chris

The one remaining line of argument in favor of torture may be dispensed with thusly.

That line of argument is the 'ticking time bomb scenario,' as in, "Would you torture if you knew that you could get information that would prevent countless deaths?" I even read recently of some "Christians" claiming that Jesus Christ himself would torture if it meant that it would spare his own mother.

This argument may be attacked on two fronts.

It is true that a person will say anything to make the pain stop. He is not limited to saying true things in his efforts. The interrogator can't know whether what he is told is true. Therefore, the interrogator cannot know whether the information can be used for useful action. Therefore, it is not actionable intelligence.

It has no informational value. This would seem to be obvious.

And worse than having no informational value --that is, as being recognized as not being worthy of prompting action on the part of the rational person who understands the zero value of nothing-- these extracted utterances will prompt to action the person who does not understand the zero value of nothing.

There is only one thing worse than having no information, and that is in converting non-actionable intelligence into an ersatz actionable intelligence. One is thus deluded about the nature of reality. At one time he knew that he knew nothing. Now he believes he knows something. He's worse off than when he started.

And since a sovereign has finite investigative and reactive forces --that is, guys with guns and analysts and the like-- the sovereign will fritter away his finite resources in taking ersatz actionable intelligence for action.

The sovereign is now further away from his (at least stated) objective in preventing the detonation of that ticking time bomb.

The argument is pure sophistry.

But back to those fools who defile the churches they ostentatiously and unrighteously inhabit, they who would defame their own Christ by ascribing to Him an inclination to such vileness. When a man cannot achieve righteousness, he will accuse his own Christ of dissolution. In that way, he is able to become Christ-like while sitting on the couch.

And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.

People's New Testament

25:40 Inasmuch as ye have done it, etc. The righteous understood well that they had often, in the name and from the love of Christ, ministered to his brethren, the poor and suffering saints, but they had never understood that their Lord accepted this as a personal service to himself. It should be distinctly noted, (1) that the saved are the righteous, or those whose sins have been washed away by Christ; (2) they are those who have lived and acted in the name of Christ, or have been obedient to his will; (3) they have been full of the love of Christ and have faithfully ministered to the distressed, especially to those of the household of faith. The love of Christ implies love of the brethren, and of all mankind.

http://bible.cc/matthew/25-40.htm

Religion is both the salvation and the undoing of mankind. I am not a big fan of organized religion for this reason: Most people are unable to wield it safely. No one is chosen. No one is better than another. No one is to conquer or kill another. Because if we all adopted any particular exhortation to conquer or kill, then we'd all eventually be dead, wouldn't we? Or the earth would be poisoned, wouldn't it?

I am not a theologian. I have little interest in the Bible, except that I have an interest in the teachings of Christ. So I like the Jefferson Bible, more properly titled, The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth Extracted Textually from the Gospels in Greek, Latin, French, and English. It is Thomas Jefferson's distillation of Christianity proper, minus all the bone waving. You may read it for free here. I highly recommend it.

I recognize the value in all religions. I believe them to be inspired. But I believe the recordings of them to be comprised chiefly of conceptual models, methods of explaining principles, methods which are appropriate to man's ability to understand a concept during any particular historical era. "Heaven is up there. You can't see it. But God can see you." "The Christ Entity resides inside the time domain. Due to information propagation within the vacuum, additional information is available to those beings who reside in higher dimensions."

The earth is not six thousand years old. This is an asinine belief. And it does not matter whether one stores his wine in the same room that a Gentile may store his wine, except if one may see that Gentile through a window. This is an asinine belief.

We all need to put down the bones around here. Step awayyyyy from the bone.

I have been attempting, over the past few years, to update the conceptual models that I see in the Bible. Our advanced knowledge of the various sciences permits us to reconcile the essence of the various religions to observable reality. Contained within the religions are prescriptions for human behavior. These are gaming strategies. A gaming strategy is a code of behavior for one actor in a game. Ideally, a gaming strategy provides for both the material and the spiritual needs of the actor. And the grand-slam, holy grail of gaming strategies is one which provides for the material and spiritual needs of all of humanity, not just those who would claim as their personal property the blessings of providence.

If this species does not update its conceptual models, it will extinguish itself. Because, obviously, in an age of advanced and ever more poisonous weaponry, gaming groups cannot covet another's property for long before we all defend ourselves right into oblivion. If we are forever pursuing one another, and if we all have the right to self-defense, then the mere act of using the latest weaponry in defending ourselves results in ruin for all.

Do you see? Should we not consider adopting a new gaming strategy?

We go down the rabbit hole a little bit here: I am going to hypothesize the existence of a few things, including higher realms and beings who inhabit them. I am going to model these places on higher dimensions.

The human brain is fascinating. It communicates among its various neurons electrochemically. It is essentially an electrical device. These neurons, in developing an electrochemical potential at their various ends, act as dipoles. A dipole is just like a refrigerator magnet; it has a positive and a negative. Or a north and a south.

Some would argue that memories and thoughts and personality are contained within the brain. I don't believe this. I tend to believe that the three-dimensional matrix of dipoles that is the brain is acting as a dynamic "tuner" for information contained elsewhere --inside the time domain, for example.

Mind dynamics are in fact totally electrodynamic in nature, but they are comprised of those strange  nonobservable time-polarized photons and EM fields over on the time axis – and not even existing in the sad old CEM/EE model so ubiquitously used. All time (and time entities) are nonobservable since the observation process itself invokes a d/dt operator upon the 4-space dynamics, being d/dt(LLLT) = LLL.  We (i.e., our physical senses as physical instruments) “see” things very much like a series of frozen 3-space snapshots LLL, and we infer the “passage of time” by comparing differences between the snapshots – just like for a motion picture film.

To couple a dynamic time-polarized photon entity on the time axis coherently to a dynamic entity (a physical body) in 3-space, one must use the coherent coupling of time-polarized photons (on the 4th axis) and longitudinally-polarized (in 3-space) photons.

Hence the real purpose of all the dendrite endings (with jillions of spikes and spikings continuously) in the brain and nervous system is to get at and produce such a coherent coupling. Many of those spikes do represent that exact coherent coupling. So long as all that coherent coupling is functional, the mind remains coupled to the body, and the two comprise a “living system”. If the coherence is lost, the coupling of mind to body is lost, and that is “death” where the “freed mind” now just occupies a part of the time domain, along with zillions and zillions of others.

http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/120305.htm

Bearden is a physicist and electrical engineer whom I highly respect. And his work just somehow seems to jibe with what I intuit to be true.

I suspect that one's consciousness resides inside the time domain. You are not you. You have no claim to you. Your ape species body is "channeling" a portion, a mind-slice, of some larger mind, the larger "human" mind, some larger consciousness. This mind may be called SUPERMIND. I do not know.

When you look at another person, you are looking at a portion of yourself. His consciousness is intertwined with your own. You are not distinct entities. You are expressions of the same entity.

"Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me." I believe Jesus of Nazareth to have been a very, very special person, one worth listening to. I suspect that he was acting as a repository for a being that I call the Christ Entity. I believe that he was being employed as a conduit of information between here and there. The human Jesus was not the same person as the Christ Entity. They were two distinct entities.

One of the more puzzling things for many Christians is the question that Christ uttered on the cross "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?"

Here is the passage in context. "Now from the sixth hour there was darkness over all the land unto the ninth hour. And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" (Matthew 27:45-46) It was at this time in which Paul writes about in 2 Corinthians 5:21. "God made Him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in Him we might become the righteousness of God."

But the question that frequently arises to many a sincere Bible Students is. "Why, at the climax of perfect obedience to his Father's will, did Jesus utter such words?" Was it in the depths of suffering and moments of final agony, the Lord experienced a moment of doubt, and felt that his Father, his God had actually deserted him?

http://www.newjerusalemcommunity.net/?c=53&a=1448

The imperfect ape-species shell called Jesus had been vacated by the Christ Entity. He noticed his absence and cried out for that entity. He cried out for His one love.

The point is, the Christ Entity resides inside each of us to some extent. When we look at one another, we are looking at us, we are looking at ourselves, and we are looking at the Christ. There is only one. What you see as a separation consciousness is an illusion.

When you hurt another, you hurt yourself. Don't you see?

It's like when you take your little brother's hand and make him punch himself in the face and you say in mock astonishment, "Why are you hitting yourself? I don't understand. Stop it."

You are hitting yourselves. Stop it.

And thus when you bring pain to another, you bring pain to yourself. And you bring pain to Christ.

Torture is never okay. Torture is the purposeful causing of pain, whether physical or mental. When you delight in torture, you delight in harming Christ.

There is nothing more antithetical to Christ than the purposeful delivery of pain.

...And so maybe I should take my own advice. Touche. I am the target audience of my own material. Hmm. Learn something new every day.

But that is the torture argument in a nutshell: Don't do it. You are harming yourself in ways that you cannot see. It is better that you die than to cause unnecesary pain to another. It is better that your meat shell be harmed than your soul be harmed.

And that is why you must love one another. You are him. He is you. That he seems there and that you seem here is just an illusion. Cut him some slack; you're dealing with an imperfect human and a perfect, divine being buried somewhere deep inside. We are all imperfect, yet we all contain the seed of God. Cultivate that seed of the divine. Don't tamp it down.

Come. Sit at my feet, Mister Obama.

Allow me to instruct you in the ways of theater.

You should never forget that, above all else, I am a showman. That is not to say that what transpires here is false. But it is to say that I have a keen understanding of how things "play." I know how things will be received by my audience. I know how I play within my theater. And I also know how you play within my theater.

"I'm not in your theater."

Come now. You're a president, aren't you? All presidents sit in on my show. They'd have to; the Future People are here. And what the Future People watch, you watch. It's just the nature of this theater, that added dimension I employ in this game of chess.

I owe it to you to inform you that you are not playing very well right now. The Future People are clucking their disapproval at your dishonorable behavior. You are officially pulling a Deval Patrick. Again, a Deval Patrick is where you flatten the tires of your duel opponent's car in lieu of engaging him properly at the appointed time, in the appointed fashion.

You are obstructing the delivery of my ticket receipts. You have no claim to be doing this. You have no moral claim to command anything, as you are not in the business of enforcing the law.

In lieu of engaging me, you are contenting yourself with inconveniencing me. And I want it to stop. I have every claim to those receipts. And you know it.

"This isn't fair. I don't want to engage you. It will initiate that thing you talk about."

'Initiate non-linearity.' Yes, I know... What a glorious day that will be, won't it? When the pin finally gets pulled and that grenade lazily tumbles to the ground... Ah... What sweet, sweet havoc I will wreak...

But that is not my problem. It is yours. I have constructed it that way. That you find it inopportune to engage me is just part of the formula. I'm sorry that you lose. And, no, you get no do-overs. As I advise every president, don't come huffing down Main Street when you finally get your gumption up. It doesn't work that way.

You have lost. Now stop contenting yourself with inconveniencing me. It doesn't look good.

I have every moral claim to those receipts. You have no moral claim to obstructing them. So stop.

From moral authority flows political authority. And from political authority flows legal authority.

Not one lawyer in a thousand would understand that statement. And that is how the United States came to extinguish itself. Its attorneys began to regard the law as an instrument to be used to achieve an end, not as the currency of justice.

The sole function of law, the reason it exists at all, is so that a mechanism may provide for the execution of justice, that which is just, that which is deserved, that which is appropriate recompense for behavior.

It only took five years, but the mainstream media has finally acknowledged the truth behind why certain photos and videos from the infamous Abu Ghraib prison camp have been blocked from public release - they show U.S. soldiers and other prison guards raping female detainees as well as children.

In an interview with the London Telegraph, Major General Antonio Taguba, the former army officer who conducted an inquiry into the Abu Ghraib jail in Iraq, confirmed the details of his original army report, that the unreleased photos showed rape and sexual abuse of women and minors.

“At least one picture shows an American soldier apparently raping a female prisoner while another is said to show a male translator raping a male detainee,” reports the Telegraph, adding, “Further photographs are said to depict sexual assaults on prisoners with objects including a truncheon, wire and a phosphorescent tube.”

Taguba also verified the credibility of eyewitness statements from other detainees that described an American-Egyptian male translator in uniform raping teenage boys.

Among the graphic statements, which were later released under US freedom of information laws, is that of Kasim Mehaddi Hilas in which he says: “I saw [name of a translator] ******* a kid, his age would be about 15 to 18 years. The kid was hurting very bad and they covered all the doors with sheets. Then when I heard screaming I climbed the door because on top it wasn’t covered and I saw [name] who was wearing the military uniform, putting his **** in the little kid’s ***…. and the female soldier was taking pictures.”

“These pictures show torture, abuse, rape and every indecency,” Taguba told the Telegraph.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/us-military-investigator-confirms-women-and-children-were-raped-at-abu-ghraib.html

And yesterday I see Press Secretary Gibbs attempt to malign the British news media for running stories which referenced Taguba's own report. How can you complain about the British news media's running with a report produced by your own Army?

Not to mention that I have to go overseas to get American news. Why is that? Why do I have to learn about nanothermite from some Danish TV station?

If Gibbs' display was not the very definition of scraping the bottom of the barrel of defenses, I don't know what is. It was embarrassing to watch. (But what was more embarrassing to watch was how the press corps just nodded and wrote it all down. The man's job is to lie to you. Why do you bother writing anything down, except so that you may have a record of what is not true? You should label your notebooks 'This stuff is not true. So at least I'm ahead of the game in determining what is true: it's the opposite of this.')

And what 'this' is, is that child rape and every other manner of depravity has occurred in these gulag hellholes. Those photos are just the tip of the iceberg.

A government cannot be considered viable unless it has a moral claim to command. Assuming that we're not talking about some boneswinger system of law that involves grunting and showing off your phallus and waving colored feathers at volcanoes in an effort to quiet them, government has one function: to enforce the laws for which it would demand a general respect.

If you have a law, you enforce it. It's very simple. There is no two-tiered system of law here, or whatever else may pass for justice in retrograde, inferior legal systems. I'm an advocate of Western Law, where people wear shoes and stuff.

The people take their cue from the government. If we're not following the law, then the reasonable man can only conclude that the government has retired itself.

Each day that those criminals remain untried is a day that USov gains legitimacy and strength. I will remind you that no United States law has any force over any present or future member of United Sovereigns of America, whether that person be natural or artificial.

The United States lacks the power to command because it lost the moral authority to speak.

The United States is dead. It retired itself upon its refusal to enforce the law.

Whose fault is that? And is it unreasonable that one may erect a political union in that sudden absence of lawful government?

(And I do understand that no United States president has possessed one iota of power since the formation of the Federal Reserve in 1913. Any powers they exercised derive not from the Constitution, but by delegation from the owners of the Federal Reserve. So my advice to those bankers is this: If you want a shot at saving your jurisdiction, I would advise instructing your man to prosecute those criminals. Because the longer they walk free, the better I look.)

Well, at least somebody is covering those tough-talkin' New Yorkers' own material.

New York: Ass Clown Land. Diaper Ville, USA

Let's not get distracted.

New photos obtained by Press TV have revealed alleged sexual harassment and rape of Iraqi prisoners at US-run Abu Ghraib detention center by American soldiers.

The alleged pictures illustrate American soldiers raping and sexually harassing Iraqi detainees.

Wayne Madsen, an investigative journalist from Washington, told Press TV that there is a lot of information about these photos.

"That is exactly what was taking place in Abu Ghraib and that information came to me from many many different sources some of whom actually stationed in Abu Ghraib at the time," according to Madsen.

Madsen added that the information that these photos being fake came from neoconservatives media.

To clarify the issue, Madsen said when some of these photos first surfaced in 2004 by the Boston Globe random, the paper was attacked immediately by known neoconservative propaganda.

He also ruled out some reports that the photos were from pornographic movies.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=96365&sectionid=3510203




Some claim they are legit, some claim they are frames from pornographic movies:

Staged photos lifted from porn websites purporting to be images of U.S. troops raping female detainees at Abu Ghraib are again circulating at the height of the torture scandal, discrediting the very real and admitted accounts of rape described in Major General Antonio Taguba’s military report into the Abu Ghraib prison.

Despite the fact that these photos were vehemently discredited and proven to be taken from porn websites when they first emerged in 2004, they are again being erroneously cited as examples of photos showing rape that the Obama administration is blocking from public release - providing debunkers with ammunition to dismiss the validity of the torture scandal altogether.

In light of the Pentagon and the White House’s bizarre efforts to deny the reality of their own internal investigation and pull a crude bait and switch yesterday in claiming that the blocked photos do not show rape, it can only be assumed that these fake photos are again being pushed as a means of discrediting the proven instances of U.S. prison guards and others raping women and children at Abu Ghraib and other detention facilities.

“New photos obtained by Press TV have revealed alleged sexual harassment and rape of Iraqi prisoners at US-run Abu Ghraib detention center by American soldiers. The alleged pictures illustrate American soldiers raping and sexually harassing Iraqi detainees,” states the report.

However, the photos do not illustrate American soldiers at all, the uniforms worn by the men in the images are clearly not those worn by U.S. troops in Iraq, they are cheap military fatigues that anyone could find at Wal-Mart or any other discount clothing store.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/fake-rape-photos-re-emerge-again-to-discredit-real-torture-scandal.html

What I do know is that the Pentagon --which is a private security firm for the owners of the Federal Reserve-- has an interest in making this rape and torture scandal disappear. Therefore, they will do everything possible to muddy the waters, including disseminating photographs which may then be debunked --thus tending to cast doubt on the entire rape and torture scandal.

Don't get suckered by any photos whose authenticity cannot be verified.

We already know all we need to know, by way of Taguba and Hersh.

(These photos may as well be real, because I can only guess what those savages did behind closed and locked doors.)

Ignore these photos.

This would not appear to be useful.

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon plans to create a new military command for cyberspace, administration officials said Thursday, stepping up preparations by the armed forces to conduct both offensive and defensive computer warfare.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/29/us/politics/29cyber.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper

Step one: Try defending against conventional threats first --you know, like planes flying into buildings and demolitions contractors rigging up the the World Trade Center with nanothermite from Lawrence Livermore-- and then we'll talk about giving you access to the people's communications.

So such a thing is not at all useful unless I cock my head and look at things from a different angle and see that your job isn't to defend me or my freedom, but to attack me and steal my freedom --my freedom being my property.

See, the thieves and brigands in the Pentagon have got it all figured out. They long ago realized that they could steal car stereos with ease if they just patrolled the parking lot in Ajax Security uniforms.

Despite what the grunt in the field or the drooling retiree may think, the Pentagon is in no way involved in defending the nation. The United States military is a private security firm for the bankers whose feet these generals lick. They're the muscle. Their job is to secure the property of Americans for delivery to their banker masters.

These frauds allow "hijacked" planes to meander around the country for half the morning before they lazily crash into buildings, they rape children in their gulag hellholes, they triple-tap football stars in the head, they lose wars to goat herders and cavemen, and they provide nanothermite for urban renewal projects. (Oh, and let's not forget the anthrax from the Army bioweapons lab.)

I have not yet named the farce that is the United States military, but they are the funniest joke in at least one, maybe two, geologic eras.

It is not an instance of comedic hyperbole to say that these generals are simply thieves. They do not work for you. Their internal directives involve stealing your property, like common criminals.

The true purpose of this cyber command is to eavesdrop on, and thwart the functioning of, the communications systems of those who own the car stereos, and who may organize to defend themselves from the local thieves.

The thing, the rationale, the true reason.

Do you always believe what people tell you?

I am home from work, yet I will not check the cafepress store for orders.

...Because I know how this ends already.

Guess what time it is, everyone?!

It's time for everyone to buy their limited edition, commemorative Chris King Teddy Bear! Yay!

Isn't it nice? And who can complain about buying a souvenir? It's the most harmless thing in the world, it's just a cuddly little bundle of sweetness. And it costs just a thin hundred and twelve ninety-nine.

So I want everyone --at the very moment you read this-- to stop what you're doing and go to my CafePress store and buy one of these. The store is here: http://www.cafepress.com/ckpi2

Go there. Now. I'm not kidding. I need to come up with $2009.40 to save my house. (That's just the immediate under-the-gun amount. If everyone buys a teddy bear, I will have enough to pay off the house and continue working for you.)

I know you people are here. You are morally obligated to feed the man who cannot feed himself when he has passed over other opportunities SO THAT he may speak to you. I will remind you that I opted out of a job that would have paid this house off over several times over, but a job that would have distracted me from this calling.

Everyone reading this is to buy a teddy bear today. No exceptions. No excuses.

Go there. Now. When I come home from work today, I want to log into my cafepress account and see the sales. You can't fool me; I know you're here. I need a place to live and something to eat. You will provide them to me while I work for you. You don't ask your pastor or rabbi to live in a cardboard box while he serves you, do you?

Hello, Future Comedians!

Tell more fart jokes. You'll have it made.

Stand-up is the worst thing that ever happened to me and I wish I had never gotten into it. I would have everything had I not foolishly believed that a good faith effort at improving the world would be rewarded with at least a place to live and something to eat.

All is gone, all is lost, all because of this cursed pursuit. Six wasted years. Broke. Old and ugly. Real catch.

What bothers me the most is that no one will ever understand how much I gave to my audience. And everyone carries on with splendid lives while I get nothing.

I have no idea who's getting this material or by what means, I have no idea how anyone ever even started getting it, I have no idea who's here and if they're talking to me, and I have no idea how I'm supposed to respond to those imaginary people. I have lost everything in this real world because I am denied the knowledge of who is here and what they expect of me.

No one has ever had the courtesy to speak to me over the past four years.

I have lost everything because of this pursuit.

I can't even conceptualize the complete zero return on effort. (Oh, it's a smashing success as far as people lining up to drain my soul. Just not a big success on any other front.)

This is the most colossal waste of my time and money ever. It actually had a negative return.

The house is now in foreclosure. (Got a letter today.) Foreclosures are not noteworthy these days. What is noteworthy is having an audience that refuses to buy its tickets. (Because I could be working a real job, you know. I work at the gas station SO THAT I can do this for you.)

I am going on vacation. It's all about me from now on. My primary concern is about me. I no longer concern myself with others.

I will be back when I'm back --if ever.

Complete nothingness.

What angers me about New Yorkers--

most particularly those in the news media-- is that they refuse to cover their own material, but yet they will disparage those who cover it for them.

We're all adults here. Let's lay it all out. The jurisdiction called United States was attacked on September 11, 2001 by the jurisdiction called New World Order. NWO is a territorially inspecific political union. It's a corporation. Its principals, both Jew and Gentile, are satanists. Concerning themselves solely with earthly riches and power, as pagans will, they intend to enslave the whole of humanity. Their actions cannot be reckoned in any currency but money. Slavery is the natural state of mankind. Unless the course of events be changed by committed actors, the future of humanity is one of a corporatist neofeudalism. You will work for those who own you. If you complain, you will be tortured and killed. That will be the extent of your existence.

New York is a dead city. Three thousand of its inhabitants were murdered in a pagan human sacrifice. That scorpion's sting landed in New York. The venom has spread throughout the country. Lawful government has fallen. You are in no way free. Americans rape children and torture people now. Misery is your chief export. Every sickness in this world flows from New York.

Since New Yorkers refuse to cover their own material and arrest their own criminals, they have relegated themselves to the status of irrelevancy.

New York is in no way relevant to any meaningful discussion.

But yet New Yorkers will badmouth those who work to stem the flow of that poison.

Few things are as tiresome as listening to people rant about their conspiracy theories. While there are, no doubt, tantalizing speculations to be made about the “inside job” that demolished the World Trade Center and the nefarious agenda of the global elite, movies about such things do well to involve James Bond and giant explosions.

http://movies.nytimes.com/2009/05/22/movies/22orde.html?scp=1&sq=new%20world%20order&st=cse

The debate is over. Nanothermite is the smoking gun. Case closed. What part don't you understand?

And while I hesitate to make things "about me," I can't help but to see a Chris King subtext in a lot of these hit pieces. (I can hear these filth mongers chatter like rats in cages, just waiting for the chance to swarm around me. At bay though they may be, they fling their lies onto any opportune target.) 'Tiresome?' You're welcome to leave my theater at any time. I trust each audience member to know his comfort level and to take leave of me when he feels the need to lie down. And this isn't a concentration camp where attendance is mandatory. Why do you come here? Why do you walk through that door each day and take a seat? It's not like I sit on your doorstep in the morning, lying in wait to spring my latest harangue on you as you walk to the train. I don't actually care if anyone gets it or not. You are not part of my target audience. And for as many people as who hate me, they sure read my stuff a lot. I've never understood that. I'm not sure that it's even theoretically possible to lose my audience; I can't even manage to get rid of those who despise me.

The most potent message New World Order conveys is its refusal to flinch in the face of what many would call fanaticism, training a focused, steady eye on their subjects without hastily making a satisfying knee-jerk judgment. Through the tears, constant rallying, paranoiac rants and hypocritical disclaimers of their subjects, Meyer and Neel remind us that these conspiracy theorists are not to be pitied but rather understood as people doing what they earnestly believe is their civic duty. They’re rabid and frankly more than a little nuts. For example, in the impending apocalypse, red and blue dots on mail apparently determine whether you get taken to a FEMA camp or get shot on sight by stormtroopers—but they’re also a determined and militantly organized group that dares you to ignore them.  

Every point-of-view can easily be accommodated by Meyer and Neel’s sprawling footage, from the people that dismiss the group because they believe “truthers” want to simplify the reasons for 9/11 and President Bush’s “War on Terror”—after these theories “everything becomes simple,” as one “truther” says—to the people that insist that they’re just misguided by their personal pain: “They have no clue how real we are,” says another as tears well up in his eyes. Even people that want to believe they’re uncovering some hidden reality buried in grainy, almost certainly Photoshopped images and so-called eyewitness reports will find plenty of convincing ammunition in Jones’ words.

...

The caricaturish red state mannerisms that many “truthers” exhibit are never exploited but rather exhibited as just one of many defining characteristics. Some of these people are born-again Christians and some are gun-toting trailer park residents but shock of all shocks, none of them are inarticulate nor are they oblivious to the fact that they’re persona non grata. Refusing to paint Jones’s cabal as the boogeymen they appear to be isn’t necessarily a daring act but, considering the insensitivity of the group’s message, it’s certainly a humane and affecting one.

http://www.nypress.com/article-19837-new-world-order.html

For my worldwide audience members, you need to understand that New Yorkers inhabit a giant tomb. Their friends were murdered by their fellow citizens. If New Yorkers ever were to permit themselves to entertain the notion that nanothermite means precisely what it means, New Yorkers' minds would implode. The human mind, by way of the psychological phenomenon known as cognitive dissonance, will attempt to reduce the psychological stress that results from holding two contradictory ideas at once. The brain will discount the value of evidence which threatens to disconfirm that person's conception of reality. "My wife was killed by the bad men. She was not part of a pagan, human sacrifice. Therefore, nanothermite doesn't mean what it means. Therefore, anyone who believes that nanothermite means what it means is insane." 9-11 Truthers must be insane. Because if they are not insane, then his worldview is incorrect and his mind will implode. Guess which one his brain will choose?

Jack McLamb, identified as a former Phoenix police officer who hosts a short-wave radio show, says Halliburton is building concentration camps and the government is marking mailboxes with colored dots to single out people for imprisonment or death. The Houston-based company once run by former Vice President Dick Cheney has been criticized for many things, but this charge might as well come from outer space.

No Facts

Jones and his cohorts offer no evidence to back up their fantastic tales. I don’t know whether this is because evidence isn’t their thing, or because filmmakers Luke Meyer and Andrew Neel preferred to concentrate on wacky personalities rather than hard facts.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601088&sid=aIXPky36s.lI&refer=muse

Outer space? No, the space beams from outer space bit came from the "news" media, that conveyor belt of lies. Who knows what madcap hijinks those little scamps are up to now.

These articles were commissioned by bankers. They attempt to smear 9-11 Truthers because if you pull that thread, it leads all the way back to these bankers and their operatives, the Bilderbergers. Do you know anything about them? Of course you don't; it's not a TV show or a video game. I'll cover them later today.

So here is the take-away for New Yorkers: If you will not avenge the deaths of your own loved ones, at least remain quiet while others do it for you. Don't badmouth them. Have a little respect for those who care.

You know you're over the target when you start receiving fire.

Dave Shiflett
Bloomberg
Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Radio host Alex Jones says 9/11 was “an inside job” orchestrated to create panic and more reliance on an increasingly repressive government. One of his sympathizers is convinced that Halliburton Co. is building “concentration camps” capable of holding 50 million Americans.

Jones and his fellow conspiracy theorists are the subject of “New World Order,” an engrossing, scary documentary airing tonight on IFC at 6:45 p.m. New York time.

Better watch it or someone may start following you.

According to Jones and company, a group of elitists is wreaking havoc to further their goal of world domination. At the controls, they say, are members of the secretive Bilderberg Group such as Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller and other bigwigs from the worlds of politics, finance and media.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/conspiracy-buffs-warn-of-kissinger-cabal-red-mailbox-dots-tv.html

It must be important to deliver fire because even the flagship paper in That Stinking City of Death, New York, ran some hit piece on their website. Their own friends, wives, husbands, and lovers got fried in that pagan, human sacrifice, yet they continue on with the hit pieces.

This is why New York is a joke. Tough-talkin' New Yorkers, high-steppin' it down the street, with crushed top hat and scuffed cane, pretending that they're relevant, ignoring the stink of their friends' corpses as they roam from door to door looking for peace.

New York: Stenchland, USA. Deathville.

"Wow. Nice crowd, nice crowd. It's good to be here tonight in your stinking shithole of a city. I openly ridicule your tear-jerking losses. Hope you found a new wife or girlfriend or whatever. The old one was just human waste anyway. Flush her down the toilet where she belongs."

Can we have a tear?

I didn't read the Los Angeles Times even when I lived in L.A.

(Which, of all the cities I lived in that I hated the most, it was L.A., hands down. It is a filthy, stinking, choking mess of a hell hole with bubbly nothings as its inhabitants.)

“New World Order,” which premieres today on the Independent Film Channel, is a film about people battling with phantoms. They are volunteers in an “information war” who see as clearly, as John saw his four Apocalyptic horsemen and seven trumpeting angels, that 9/11 was an “inside job,” that the military-industrial complex killed Kennedy, and that an international “power elite” is plotting to enslave us all, excepting for those it will kill outright.

They are hard to pigeonhole politically, these conspiracy adepts, trusting neither the “socialist Democrats” nor the “fascist Republicans” — Ron Paul seems to be their man, if anyone is — yet sounding as often like ’60s leftist radicals as right-wing militiamen. They take the 1st Amendment as seriously as any card-carrying member of the ACLU, styling themselves muckrakers and speakers of truth to power, often through a bullhorn.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/review-new-world-order-on-independent-film-channel.html

Nanothermite is a debate ender. The L.A. Times, in its journalistic capacity, should be aware of nanothermite and its impact on the debate. That they carry on as they do indicates either that they are not up to speed on things, or that this is a hit job.

I hang around a few newspapers every morning: the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Rutland Herald and the Brattleboro Reformer. In five years, I have NEVER referenced an L.A. Times article. I don't read them. Why? Because I have a finite amount of time in the morning. Obviously, I'm not going to read papers that are not up to speed on the prerequisites to any informed discussion.

Holder.

Okay. We're gonna tighten things up around here. I know that standards have slipped. You somehow think you can administratively eliminate the unorganized militia with a few keystrokes, and your boss over there seems to think that he's got the power to lock people up forever without a trial.

I don't know where you two went to law school and I don't want to know.

So stop playing with your toes and read up on Vattel. Here's just a snippet:

§ 1. What is meant by a nation or state.

NATIONS or states are bodies politic, societies of men united together for the purpose of promoting their mutual safely and advantage by the joint efforts of their combined strength.

§ 2. It is a moral person.

Such a society has her affairs and her interests; she deliberates and takes resolutions in common; thus becoming a moral person, who possesses an understanding and a will peculiar to herself, and is susceptible of obligations and rights.

To establish on a solid foundation the obligations and rights of nations, is the design of this work.

§ 3. Definition of the law of nations.

The Law of Nations is the science which teaches the rights subsisting between nations or states, and the obligations correspondent to those rights. ⁽¹⁾

http://www.constitution.org/vattel/vattel_pre.htm#002

"It is a moral person." Right off the bat, your abortion jurisdiction is at a disadvantage. I don't think Vattel ever contemplated that making people eat each other's cum would predispose a nation to a moral status.

Your jurisdiction is garbage. You can't defend the citizenry against metastasizing anal cancers, your jurisdiction rapes children in its torture chambers, and your legal machinery has been hijacked by technicians with no understanding of law whatsoever. ...like you and your boss.

What kind of troglodyte law are you people practicing over there? Is the law book even printed in English?

Ignoring your laws is fun. I'm glad that you've acquiesced to lacking jurisdiction. (And no, you don't get any do-overs. You lost your chance to assert jurisdiction. You've had quite enough time to arrest me.)

Well, today's my lucky day!

Maybe, anyhow. Let's see if two more unlikely events occur today. (One unlikely thing means nothing. Two, more, and three, that is a sufficient combination of unlikely events to indicate a transmission of information.) So bring on the omens, SUPERMIND!

I found this completely accidentally while I was walking around outside:

If my graduate degree in horticulture was worth anything, I have identified it as trifolium repens. It is estimated that one in ten thousand are four-leaf.

The Irish consider them good luck. (Assuming you're not drunk when you find it.)

Just in case y'ever need to know.

That's some crack police work there.

A slick FBI informant roped four Muslim converts into a horrific terror plot to blow up synagogues and military jets by handing them piles of cash and gifts and even bags of weed, relatives of the suspects said today.

...

"He was very persistent and every time he came for James he took him away. They said they were going out to eat dinner," she said. "Whenever we needed anything Maqsood would help -- like financially --he gave us money to pay rent.

...

But during the course of the year, Maqsood kept trying to steer Cromitie down a path to jihad - giving him religious pamphlets, clothing and prayer rugs. In the end, it seemed that cash and gifts worked better.

She said Maqsood promised to get Cromitie jobs and once said he'd give him a black Mercedes Benz. On repeated occasions he gave Cromitie cameras, cash and even drugs.

"Maqsood gave him a lot of marijuana," she said.

An FBI spokesman did not return a call for comment on the gift giving.

...

Then, as they were about to leave, Cromitie kissed her on the cheek and promised, "Soon we are going to be all right," she said. "I guess he meant financially he meant that we were going to be okay."

She said a friend told her James had said he was going to be getting $50,000.

http://www.nypost.com/seven/05232009/news/regionalnews/jihad_girlfriend__they_were_tricked_by_g_170683.htm?page=0

Do you often have to pay people to commit crimes?

Return to Oz

Like I said, some of my biggest fans are Jews.

They're secretly flattered with the attention. It is my pleasure. You're worth it.

Here is a drawing of my present understanding of your community. It is all a successive approximation. Forgive any errors, but consider any insights.

Click to enlarge.

What appears to have happened is that the Talmudists (red) have caused the greatest body of Jews (green) to turn away from the "other brother" (yellow) --if I recall that one story from Jewish mythology correctly, a story I cannot seem to re-locate, a story about which "brother" shall take his seat at Jerusalem.

The Talmudists continually traumatize the am ha'aretz (green.) They tell them that everyone hates them and that they are only safe within the group. This process creates a durable "army." Unit cohesion is maintained with periodic traumatizing (spray-painting swastikas in Brooklyn Heights) and by never permitting wounds to heal ("Never forget the Shoah.")

If you care to investigate the matter, you will find that the Shoah was commissioned by the Talmudists.

Jewish politics is fascinating to study. The cultural Jews appear, for the most part, to take their marching orders from a steering committee within the Hive Mind. That steering committee is comprised of Talmudists. In the Jewish community, if you don't stick with the group you get ostracized and cut off from the gravy train of good jobs. This is why Jews are always outsiders. They will never integrate. If they do, the Talmudists lose control of that population. This is why the Talmudists are forever executing false-flag events to convince their captured population that they are only safe within the group.

Those Talmudists gravitate toward banking. They understand that the best way to control Gentiles --or any group, all of which these Talmudists are religiously sworn to enslave (I've read your texts; you can't kid a kidder)-- is to control the medium of their exchange. Since they control the financial system, they are in the position to dole out choice positions in various industries. This is how they purchase the services of cultural Jews.

What cultural Jews do not understand --since I doubt any of them know anything whatsoever about the Talmud-- is that they work for the very rabbis who commissioned the Shoah. (And 9-11, might I add.)

These Talmudists WILL eventually pin all this on their slaves, the am ha'aretz, the cultural Jews. And there will be another false-flag pogrom, thus creating another generation of traumatized slaves who will cleave to the Talmudists and carry out their bidding.

This has gone on for thousands of years, and has enriched no one but those Talmudist rabbis.

So cultural Jews --like nearly everyone else in this world-- have permitted their love of money to deliver to their captors the labor necessary for the execution of their captors' vile, murderous, beastly designs.

Now: What happens if you continue working for these Talmudists? The entire world will be converted into a Nazi death camp. Special Drawing Rights. World Government. Eugenics. Think it through.

Your Redemption is nigh. And guess who brings it about? You do, yourselves. So get moving. You have to shut down those Talmudists and fast. It's not my job; it's your job. Everyone covers their own material from now on.

I would like to gently inquire of the soup bowl-wearin' butter bars in the Pentagon,

at what point do you start doing something? I mean, aside from putting your wieners in little boys' bum bums and losing wars and letting anal cancers fly planes into your office building?

At what point do you win the right to change out of your PT gear and put on a uniform?

At what point do you win the right to look that child in the eye at the parade, that child who looks to you as the watchful warriors you claim to be?

At what point do I no longer look at the ground when people ask if I ever served?

At what point do you plan on doing something?

Okay...

So let us suppose that the Pentagon vehicle was a Boeing 757. Was it necessarily Flight 77? My initial suspicion is that it was not. In order for a 757 to strike the Pentagon at the height that it did without the low-slung engines scraping the ground, it would seem that it would have to be controlled by computer. The Flight Termination System, perhaps. I suspect the presence of Flight Termination Systems on the WTC vehicles as well because if the event was a military operation --which it was, due to the debate-ending nanothermite-- you don't leave anything to chance during a military operation. "We've got the nanothermite all ready to go, now let's hope our dimwitted terriss can fly the planes into the buildings while going five hundred miles an hour or whatever." Uh huh. So I suspect FTSs on those planes.

In a document called "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century" published by The American Enterprise's "Project for a New American Century"(1), System Planning Corporation (SPC) International executive, Dov Zakheim, called for "some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor" being necessary to foster the frame of mind needed for the American public to support a war in the Middle East that would politically and culturally reshape the region. A respected and established voice in the intelligence community, his views were eagerly accepted, and Dov went from his position at Systems Planning Corporation to become the Comptroller of the Pentagon in May 2001. (2) Perhaps not so coincidentally, it was an SPC subsidiary, TRIDATA CORPORATION, that oversaw the investigation after the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in 1993.

SPC, according to their official website, specializes in many areas of defense technology production and manufacture, including a system developed by their Radar Physics Group called the Flight Termination System, or FTS.(3) This is a system used to destroy target drones (craft that would be fired on by test aircraft or weaponry) in the event of malfunction or "misses". This highly sophisticated war-game technology allows the control of several 'drones' from a remote location, on varying frequencies, and has a range of several hundred miles. This technology can be used on many different types of aircraft, including large passenger jets.

According to the SPC website (4), a recent customer at that time was Eglin AFB, located in Florida. Eglin is very near another Air Force base in Florida-MacDill AFB, where Dov Zakheim contracted to send at least 32 Boeing 767 aircraft, as part of the Boeing /Pentagon tanker lease agreement.(5)

...

When seen in comparison, it is obvious that the plane approaching the Trade Center has both of these structures-the FTS module and the midair refueling equipment, as configured on the modified Boeing 767 tankers. Of particular interest is the long tube-like anomalous structure under the rear fuselage area of flight 175-this structure runs along the right rear bottom of the plane, as it also does on the Boeing 767 refueling tanker pictured.

 

After considering this information, I am convinced that flight 175, as pictured on the news media and official reports, was in fact a refitted Boeing 767 tanker, with a Flight Termination System attached. Use of this system would also explain the expert handling of aircraft observed in both New York and Washington investigations, which has been officially credited to inexperienced flight school students.

http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/bradm/911index/Dov_Zakheim_911.html

So our little friend, Dov Zakheim --Comptroller of the Pentagon in the spring of 2001, from which 2.3 trillion dollars went missing in 2001-- is involved with the FTS and Boeing 767s, and he just happens to dig the idea of a new Pearl Harbor. And I bet that Rabbi Zakheim is just BFFs with Larry Silverstein.

Here is a composite of the narrative aircraft and up top is a Boeing 757. At bottom is a Boeing 767:

The 767 would satisfy the image caught on the guard shack camera. Please note that the 767 shown above is not turned to the same degree that the 757 is. I found the images on the internet and they are adequate for my purposes. If the 767 were turned to the same degree as both the 757 and the narrative aircraft, its apparent length would shorten and it would fit the profile even better.

So: Little Dovie Boy, he who just loooooves the idea of a "new Pearl Harbor," he whose SPC has a contract to provide 767 tankers to the Pentagon, whose SPC Radar Physics Group also produces the Flight Termination System --a system for remotely controlling aircraft-- seems to have worked with his buddy Larry Silverstein to kill three birds with one stone:

• Get rid of that asbestos-riddled pig of an office complex, earning Silverstein some fat jumbo in the process,
• Provide his Homeland with a catalyzing event to get their zombie jurisdiction, the United States, to reshape the Middle East toward the goal of creating a Greater (anal cancer) Israel, and,
• In some pagan, weirdo way, the symbol of America's might, that phallic symbol of America's power, the Twin Towers would be destroyed, later to be replaced by a bigger wiener, the taller "Freedom" Tower.

Also please note that the rabbi's SPC subsidiary, Tridata, oversaw the "investigation" into the '93 WTC bombing. Also note that the rabbi is BFFs with Michael Mukasey, who ran legal interference for the Hive Mind during that provocateured event. ('93 was an inside job, too.)

And I bet you a day's pay that Rabbi Zakheim is not one of the Old Schoolers.

...I bet you he's one of the Earthen Ones.

...Isn't he?

"King, I'm gonna get you."

It rolls off the tongue so naturally, doesn't it, rabbi?

------------

Attorney General Holder: Investigate all of this. Your prime suspect is Dov Zakheim. The vehicles which struck the Twin Towers and the Pentagon were most likely his FTS-equipped 767s.

What happened to Flights 11, 175, and 77? I can only guess. I wouldn't put anything past those satanists. (They regard non-Jews as subhuman, after all.)

And Shanksville: Now I know why there were no bodies recovered. That wasn't Flight 93, a 757, was it? That plane was a 767, wasn't it? What does the wreckage indicate?

So the terriss just happened to choose to hijack all 757s that day? Why would they care? Or did Little Dovie Boy select flights that were 757s because a 767 could easily pass for a 757?

Get an aircraft expert. Identify this vehicle:

Love or Fear

She said Maqsood promised to get Cromitie jobs and once said he would give him a black Mercedes-Benz. On repeated occasions, he gave Cromitie cameras, cash and even drugs, she said.

"Maqsood gave him a lot of marijuana," she said.

An FBI spokesman did not return a call for comment on the alleged gift giving.

Williams' mother, Elizabeth McWilliams, said her son fell under Maqsood's sway in April with promises to help with medical bills for his sick brother.

http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/jihad-lite/

So, again, newspapers have acted as dutiful conveyor belts of lies. The New York Post, for example, dedicated an entire front page to scaring the hell out of New York's Jews by displaying a gigantic photo of the perp walk and the legend, "They're Gonna Gitcha!"

In the public consciousness, it doesn't even matter now whether the accused are guilty. It is the nature of the business that these newspapers will not spill as much ink on a retraction as they did the original lies. The damage has been done. The objective has been achieved. The population has been frightened.

I read one article in some newspaper that actually used the word "bloodthirsty." If you are a journalist, you should never be using the word "bloodthirsty."

1. "Someone on this train wants to steal my wallet."
2. "That person would prefer to enslave me, rather than sneak up on me repeatedly to steal my wallet. It is less 'expensive.' "
3. "Threatening my security or physiological needs is an efficient means of enslaving me."
4. "Making me believe that my security or physiological needs are threatened is less expensive than actually threatening them."
5. "Therefore, someone on this train wants to scare me."

"Let me just say, I think people should be afraid." --Newt Gingrich on Meet the Press 5/24/09

Newt Gingrich is not stupid or ill-informed. Therefore, he is involved in scaring Americans as a means of enslaving them.

Pick one: Love or Fear. One leads to freedom, the other leads to enslavement. What shall be your mindset?

Alright. Here's some junk you people can buy.

If you refuse to buy your tickets, you can at least buy some of this stuff.

http://www.cafepress.com/ckpi2

Some of the stuff is just grossly overpriced. I marked it up to whatever level will pay the bills. Most of it, however, is reasonably priced.

Here are some representative items:

This is a Flip Mino HD video camera, crazily overpriced on purpose at $400. They normally sell for $219. $400 was the most I could charge for it. So I make $200 on each camera. Get it?

Here is the most expensive mini poster you will ever buy at $400. I make $397 per mini poster. (Nice markup, eh?)

Here is a 757 photo--

that appears to be turned at approximately the same angle as the incoming narrative aircraft.

Superimposed on the narrative video, with the scale so the heights of the tails are approximately the same, it looks like this:

The lengths are the same and the cants of the tails are the same.

Well, then let us suppose that the missile was a 757. What is the color of a jet-fuel explosion? Does it match the color of the fireball seen in the video?

If there are any graphics people or simulator people in the house,

I should point out that the narrative aircraft approached the Pentagon at an angle such that the apparent length of it would be compressed. (It did not get captured by the guard shack camera side-on, but rather with the nose of the vehicle closer to the camera than the tail-end of the vehicle.) This would account for the differing cant of the tail, as well.

I don't have the software to rotate images and scale them.

So the task is to account for all angles, rotate any vehicles, scale them properly, and check for differences.