The stage photos, the rubble series, the beer series, and the holding-eyeglasses series are courtesy of Gregg Matthews, Orlando. All others by Chris King.
Clicking the thumbnail will show a 300dpi version.
Generally, the staged photos were taken in the olden days, around 2004. I have not aged at all, so you may regard these to be an accurate representation of what my big fat pot belly does not look like.
When the Government Man decides to stab his fat, dirty fingers at things and initiate non-linearity, you may use these in your newspaper or on your TV show if you like.
Please legally notify the City of New York that a crime of mass murder has occurred within its territory. Also notify the state government.
When I arrive in New York to ply my comedy trade, I would like to meet with you to coordinate the operations of 9-11 Crimes Tribunal with the Mayor's office.
Also please submit on my behalf to the City of New York an application for a concealed weapons permit. If you need fingerprints or background check information, it may be gotten from the State of Florida. I had a concealed carry permit there. Defense Investigative Service may also have any background check info. When you submit the application, ask the Mayor's office to expedite its consideration.
New York is our first exoskeleton jurisdiction. Figure it out. I have no reason to believe that we will not receive total cooperation from city government.
The past eight years are about to disappear. Get crackin'.
I expect to arrive in your city sometime by spring.
I have looked over your work and I have looked into your eyes. You are a good man. You are weary of the criminals in your own midst. Don't worry: their days are numbered.
I and my audiences --present and future-- trust that we can count on your office's assistance with the operations of 9-11 Crimes Tribunal.
I would ask a few things of you prior to my arrival. I would like you to assemble a team of your finest law enforcement officers to work with 9-11 Crimes Tribunal. And our legal team will need to coordinate our activities with your office. Perhaps you can designate a liaison.
I will be submitting to your office an application for a concealed weapons permit. If there is one person in this world whose line of work might warrant carrying a weapon, don't you suppose it would be the comedian? ...It is the New Golden Age of Comedy, after all; it's not rubber chickens we carry anymore, it's guns.
It is an honor to contribute to your city in whatever way I can.
This, from the Style section of yesterday's New York Times:
I like this Lanvin aesthetic.
I like the outfit on the guy on the far left. Chris wears that. The trousers may be a bit blousy for my taste, so maybe the trousers will be slimmer, like on the guy next to him. I like the boots and the wide belt. Maybe some understated-looking ranking insignia on the collar.
Chris is forever accompanied by his Special Attache, who is dressed in roughly similar fashion, though distinguished by a slightly different uniform.
The Special Attache is a beautiful young man, mid- to late twenties. He will have been through several years of diplomatic and linguistic training. He handles all of Chris' affairs.
Chris and his Special Attache have been together for several years. They have come to love one another in a respectful, distanced fashion. They are very protective of one another. They are inseparable. For metaphysics reasons that I find it difficult to understand much less explain, male love is the highest form of love. And that love need not be sullied with a 3-space expression.
Chris and his Special Attache can almost read each other's minds, that's how tuned in to each other they are.
Published: January 23, 2010
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — Nobody else in the Obama administration has been mired in Pakistan for as long as Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates. So on a trip here this past week to try to soothe the country’s growing rancor toward the United States, he served as a punching bag tested over a quarter-century.
“Are you with us or against us?” a senior military officer demanded of Mr. Gates at Pakistan’s National Defense University, according to a Pentagon official who recounted the remark made during a closed-door session after Mr. Gates gave a speech at the school on Friday. Mr. Gates, who could hardly miss that the officer was mimicking former President George W. Bush’s warning to nations harboring militants, simply replied, “Of course we’re with you.”
Mr. Gates, who repeatedly told the Pakistanis that he regretted their country’s “trust deficit” with the United States and that Americans had made a grave mistake in abandoning Pakistan after the Russians left Afghanistan, promised the military officers that the United States would do better.
His final message delivered, he relaxed on the 14-hour trip home by watching “Seven Days in May,” the cold war-era film about an attempted military coup in the United States.
It is interesting to me and others that Gates would, one, go to the trouble of playing a particular movie during the flight and, two, bother to mention it in an interview with the Times.
Gates, from his days at the CIA, is not to be trusted. Why, his people run coke and operate black torture sites in every far-flung corner of the world. He is an agent of unlawful government. He represents death and misery and slavery.
There are deep divisions within the military. They are going to crack open soon. So the question I put to all of you is this: Who do you work for? What shall be the fate of your children when your terms in office expire, when you no longer wield power to the benefit and protection of your kin? What shall be the fate of future generations in a world of lawlessness and tyranny?
Who do you work for, gentlemen? What lies have been whispered into your ears to secure your complicity in events of the disastrous past eight years? Did it all work out as well as you had hoped? As you had been promised?
Either you defend the law or you do not.
Where do you stand, Mullen? How about your generals? Are you fit to look in the eye the boy on the sidewalk who salutes as you march down the street, as you jut out your chest and claim to defend both him and his rights?
...Or are the curtains not quite matching the carpets over there?
Aren't you boys done licking the boots of your CIA masters? Or have you not defiled your uniforms quite enough?
Any assassination of Barack Obama will be executed by the CIA, it will be enabled by the Secret Service, and it will be capitalized upon by turncoats in the Pentagon, the same geniuses who deposit 7-series compressors on Murray Street and who can't seem to win a war against goat herders.
It's time for everyone in a uniform and within earshot to determine sides. Do it now, before you get caught flatfooted. Identify your targets and sidle up to your weapons.
--I will always be wearing a white lab coat when someone's demonstrating something, like the latest IPod or latest cellphones or whatever, or if they have a monkey to show off, or if we're doing a cooking segment. I will have an extendable pointer in my pocket that I can take out and extend and point to things I don't understand about the cooking. (Hey: Do you know how you'll sometimes purposefully spaz out when someone's doing something? Like if someone's spending a great deal of effort writing something, you'll walk by and kind of spaz out and accidentally hit their arm so they make a stray mark on their calligraphy project or whatever? Well, during the cooking segments maybe I'll point at what the guest is making in that saucepan over there --"Which one?" "This one over here."--and I'll reach over the stovetop set up on set and I'll accicentally knock our chef's creation on the floor, and then I'll say, "Oh. My. Look what I've done," and I'll bend over to wipe it up and grab onto his crabcakes platter for support and the whole thing just goes on the floor. Big laughs, trust me.)
In short, I always ruin everything with my lab coat and my extendable pointer.
And for the game show segments --whether they be the 3-D Maze of Doom or some sort of Wheel of Fortune guessing game or whatever-- for those who choose poorly (say they unwisely chose Door Number Two or whatever) I can say, "Oh... That's too bad. It seems that you didn't win." (And by the way, I'm always holding an index card for some reason.) But I say, "Well, maybe we've got something for you anyway." So I go over by the desk and get down on one knee and fish around and pull out a cardboard box from under the desk that has been written on the side with marker: "Go ahead and give one of these to the losers."
And there's maybe a roll of paper towels or some knock-off perfume or half-used car wax in the cardboard box and I fob this garbage off on our LOSER and say, "Well, here's your consolation prize. Sure, I know it's not one of the FABULOUS PRIZES you COULD have won, but, you know, it's a consolation prize anyway. [Studio audience moans its lamentation.] ...It's really too bad that you won't be sharing in all that cash and going to cool parties and all that, but... ...you know, maybe this roll of paper towels will cheer you up." And then I glad-hand him and extend an arm toward his seat so that he may promptly return to his nothing existence.
...You bet your ass it is...
I understand you've got guns over there.
Please commission to be made one velvet-lined oak box, in which will be stored one pump-action, 12-gauge shotgun.
The weapon shall be unadorned. It shall be inscribed with the following legend in small, unobtrusive type on the barrel:
9-11 CRIMES TRIBUNAL
Serial No. 001
Get it ready.
As you know by now, the CIA is the secret government of bankers. They throw bombs, they run coke, they torture people, and they bomb whatever they want with their drones --after they whack a few of their own, to provide the cover for their false-flag op.
The CIA also maintains dossiers on every last elected United States official for the purpose of blackmailing them.
The CIA will be disappearing, obviously. It is incompatible with lawful government.
But it will lash out as a means of defending itself from legislative shutdown.
You and your generals will want to game out its disappearance. Figure out the most efficient means of terminating it. Keep that plan in the pipeline for deployment.
Remember your mantra: "Those with the guns make the rules. It would seem obvious."
They are the zipper tab. Do not let go of it. You are holding the one thing that will unzip the entire crime, including 9-11.
This TARP bill? I didn't understand it at the time, but that 700 billion was just a window, through which a ton of money has passed. 700 billion was not the sum total; it was like the size of the teller's window at the bank. Though the teller's window may be two feet wide by three feet high, it is through this window that any amount of money may pass.
Likewise, this 700 billion was just a window, through which has passed some twenty-eight trillion dollars. This number comes from Bloomberg. I do not know how it is calculated. Talk to Ron Paul or Lew Rockwell to figure out precisely how.
The point is, these thieving bankers have completely looted the treasury of TWENTY-EIGHT TRILLION DOLLARS by way of TARP.
You've got ahold of those thieves. Do not let go. The end result, obviously, is going to be the shutting down of the Federal Reserve.
It is my understanding that with a single flick of a legal finger, that thieving, parasitic organization may be shut down:
On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen, President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out of business. The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress. We can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superceded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.
Keep your eye on the ball: total Federal Reserve shutdown and the arrest and trial of New York Fed officers. You turn over that rock and your 9-11 financiers will scurry out.
ABC News: Feds Quietly Attempting to ID Mutallab’s Handler, Whose Existence They’ve Refused To Acknowledge For Past Month
January 28, 2010
Buried at the very end of a two page article published on ABC News on January 22, 2010, is this quote:
Federal agents also tell ABCNews.com they are attempting to identify a man who passengers said helped Abdulmutallab change planes for Detroit when he landed in Amsterdam from Lagos, Nigeria.
Authorities had initially discounted the passenger accounts, but the agents say there is a growing belief the man have played a role to make sure Abdulmutallab “did not get cold feet.”
Kurt Haskell has indeed been telling the story about this man since immediately after the Christmas Day incident. On December 26, Sheena Harrison of MLive.com reported:
A Michigan man [Kurt Haskell] who was aboard Northwest Airlines Flight 253 says he witnessed Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab trying to board the plane in Amsterdam without a passport.
Haskell said he and his wife were sitting on the ground near their boarding gate in Amsterdam, which is when they saw Mutallab approach the gate with an unidentified man.
While Mutallab was poorly dressed, his friend was dressed in an expensive suit, Haskell said. He says the suited man asked ticket agents whether Mutallab could board without a passport. “The guy said, ‘He’s from Sudan and we do this all the time.’”
Mutallab is Nigerian. Haskell believes the man may have been trying to garner sympathy for Mutallab’s lack of documents by portraying him as a Sudanese refugee.
The ticket agent referred Mutallab and his companion to her manager down the hall, and Haskell didn’t see Mutallab again until after he allegedly tried to detonate an explosive on the plane.
Five days later, MLive.com published an update written by Haskell in which he said this about obfuscation on the part of the FBI and Dutch authories:
Please note that there is a very easy way to verify the veracity of my prior “sharp dressed man” account. Dutch police have admitted that they have reviewed the video of the “sharp dressed man” that I referenced. Note that it has not been released anywhere, You see, if my eye witness account is false, it could easily be proven by releasing the video. However, the proof of my eyewitness account would also be verified if I am telling the truth and I am. There is a reason we have only heard of the video and not seen it. dutch authorities, “RELEASE THE VIDEO!” This is the most important video in 8 years and may be all of two minutes long. Show the entire video and “DO NOT EDIT IT”! The American public deserves its own chance to attempt to identify the “sharp dressed man”. I have no doubt that if the video indicated that my account was wrong, that the video would have already swept over the entire world wide web. Instead of the video, we get a statment that the video has been viewed and that the terrorist had a passport. Each of these statements made by the FBI is a self serving play on semantics and each misses the importance of my prior “sharp dressed man” account. The importance being that the man “Tried to board the plane with an accomplice and without a passort”. The other significance is that only the airport security video can verify my eyewitness account and that it is not being released.
So you're sayin' we can save all that money on those naked body scanners just by looking at the surveillance video taken in Amsterdam? To see who this well-dressed man is who prevailed upon airline employees to let our Underpants Bomber board the plane without ID?
But you say the FBI assures us that all is well, that there's nothing to see here? ...Oh. Well why didn't you just say so? It's settled then: Nothing to see.
Aw c'mon, everyone; it's not like I'm peggin' 'im as anything. Hell, Jon Stewart's gay, that sham marriage of his notwithstanding...
Keith Olbermann's gay --I know that for a fact. And you know what they say about tall guys with big hands, right? ...Yeah, well, apparently he never got the memo. There's always got to be one guy who completely throws off the curve.
So don't you worry, you uproarious beauty. I'm just playin' around.
... ... ... ... ... Keep your dance card open, that's all I'm sayin'...
Allow yourself to feel. Within the guiding latticework of reason, allow yourself to feel.
It is the blossom upon the trellis.
That is the artist's way.
You know, the scam involving a tax on the by-product of all human industry --carbon, that elixir of life, exhaled by every last human-- the perfect tax laid on everyone and everything by bankers, that scam, that con job to end all con jobs?
Even vehemently pro-AGW news outlets admit its game over for the IPCC
Paul Joseph Watson
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
The multi-billion dollar global warming fraud is truly beginning to crumble, with even vehement man-made climate change advocates like the BBC acknowledging that the credibility of the IPCC is shot.
“The bloggers are all over the UN IPCC 2007 report, the bible of global warming, which predicted all manner of dire outcomes for our planet unless we got a grip on rising temperatures — and it seems to be crumbling in some pretty significant areas,” writes the BBC’s Andrew Neil in an article entitled ‘The dam is cracking‘.
Climategate was merely the opening salvo in a series of seemingly never-ending scandals that have engulfed the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change over the last few weeks.
The first major blow came when the IPCC had to admit that their 2007 forecast that the Himalayan Glaciers would disappear by 2035 was completely wrong. The absurd claim was first made by a little-known Indian scientist in an interview for an online magazine, invoked by the World Wildlife Fund, and then copied into the 2007 IPCC report with no investigation as to its accuracy.
In reality, even if IPCC estimates of global warming are proven correct, which is severely doubtful in light of their recent track record, the glaciers will be around for at least centuries longer.
“In fact, the IPCC’s 2007 report cites WWF documents as “evidence” at least another 15 times,” writes Andrew Bolt.
“Elsewhere it cites a non-scientific, non-peer-reviewed paper from another activist body, the International Institute for Sustainable Development, as its sole proof that global warming could devastate African agriculture.”
It then emerged that the scientist who first made the claim, Syed Hasnain, is now employed by The Energy Research Institute – headed by IPCC Chairman Rajendra Pachauri. Just two weeks ago TERI won up to $500,000 from the Carnegie Corporation to study Hasnain’s bogus claim.
Pachauri, portrayed as an authoritative scientists by some when in fact he is a railway engineer, only made himself look worse by initially attacking climate skeptics as “arrogant” and believers in “voodoo science” when the glaciers issue was highlighted. Pachauri later had to retract his words but still refuses to apologize. Pachauri’s reputation is in tatters and he is under intense pressure to resign.
The credibility of the IPCC was further devastated when it was revealed that their predictions on the Amazon rainforest were also lifted wholesale from WWF propaganda with no independent verification whatsoever.
Amidst all this scandal, new peer-reviewed studies have emerged to confirm the obvious – the world had ice age activity even when levels of greenhouse gases were four times higher than the level of our pre-industrial times.
Global warming is heading to the same dustbin of history as Y2K, SARS and swine flu – another manufactured scare peddled primarily to make vast profits for corrupt elitists at the expense of the general public. The entire fraud is collapsing under the weight of its own lies as new revelations of IPCC deception and bias emerge on an almost daily basis thanks to the sterling work of climate skeptics who have had their convictions vindicated.
Wai-wai-wait: I thought deniers were just kookie weirdos. You mean they're not? You mean they're the only ones around here who know what they're talking about?
What's your take-away? If a government agent is speaking, it's a lie. If a UN representative is speaking, it's a lie. If a scientist is speaking, it's a lie.
Second issue: Did you take that H1N1 vaccine like I advised against? Turns out that was a big scam, too, right? You know that every indication is that that virus was genetically engineered, just like I told you, right? Do you know why governments worldwide were pushing it? Yup: money. It, too, was a money-making scam. And here's the cherry on top: The scammers who engineered that virus and sold the vaccine to "solve" that "problem" also likely put cancer viruses and sterilants into the vaccine. They're malthusian, hyper-super-eco-nuts who want to "control" and "prevent" the "disease" known as humanity.
Yeah, I'd say the corporate news media's credibility is now -25. They could tell me the earth was round and I wouldn't believe it. "Yeah. Uh huh."
The bankers who hired compartmentalized elements of the Pentagon to fly drones into the Twin Towers also own controlling interests in these vaccine companies. And if they can get the Pentagon to fly drones into the Twin Towers, don't you suppose they can get them to gin up some new agent in their bioweapons labs?
Are you connecting the dots yet?
The UN needs to be shut down, by the way. It's a con job clearinghouse.
According to game theory, I can absolutely guarantee you that Israelis will want to detonate a weapon in this land. It's a dead-man switch.
Communicate to its leadership that they've been reading their own press kit a little too much. Alas, no one will actually notice should that nation disappear.
Keep an eye on that error.
To recap your tasks, in descending priority:
I've been thinking about how best to proceed --one, from a legitimacy standpoint and, two, from a practical standpoint.
Regardless of where 9-11 Crimes Tribunal derives its authority, I recommend working with existing jurisdictions as much as possible: United States and the several states. This is because they already have the law enforcement infrastructure. 9-11 Crimes Tribunal does not yet have even a fax machine, much less subpoena powers or jail cells.
Do you remember that movie with Sigourney Weaver, called Alien? In it, she climbs inside a robot-like exo-skeleton and uses this to fight the alien queen. With just some slight movements of her arms and legs and hands, she is able to command this larger force. She is able to multiply her force.
Do you remember Aumann and his non-cooperative game theory? His theory, I am convinced, had been misappropriated by criminals of every stripe, particularly bankers, for the purpose of using the jurisdiction called United States for the purpose of force multiplication. They have employed that jurisdiction for the purpose of dismantling lawful government.
Do you remember those "message force multipliers" who would show up on various news networks to sell the war and torture and whatever all else? Turns out that these people were on the payroll of the Pentagon or the CIA or the defense industry. These message force multipliers were using the news media to multiply their force. Force multiplication has applicability within the larger discipline of information warfare.
We are going to use existing structures to multiply our force. We will use the police powers and the legal systems of the existing jurisdictions to restore law.
When you find yourself in the middle of a bar fight, do you immediately start swinging? No. Your first order of business is to locate the beer bottles and the pool cues. They are your force multiplication.
Precept: You will always, always, always identify and employ existing structures for the purpose of multiplying your force.
I appreciate your help in these matters. You are working pro bono for now. (Just like me!) When I start getting paid, you start getting paid. I can't imagine what I would do with any past or future earnings but to put it to some good use. My intention is to use that money to fund our operations. I do not necessarily state that you will find the compensation adequate. (Your guild, after all, got us into this mess in the first place by allowing your fellow lawyers to dismantle lawful government. You will now fix what you broke.)
On the particulars of using existing jurisdictions for force multiplication: I will defer to your judgment as lawyers. Your job is to know those legal systems and any maxims of law or whatever such that you know where all the legal switches are in that exoskeleton, the switches that may be flicked with a finger.
For example, you need to figure out how to use that 7-series compressor to legally compel a jurisdiction to act for us, whether it be in effecting arrests, questionings, subpoenas, temporary jailings, whatever. Your task is to use that compressor to legally convert all other jurisdictions into zombies. Your task is to legally compel all jurisdictions into acting as force-multiplying exoskeletons.
When legally notifying jurisdictions of our plans, take note of which jurisdictions decline to lend their legal structures to this task. This is not playtime. Impress that upon them. Explain to them that the world's sole guarantor of human liberty, the jurisdiction called United States, was hijacked and has been largely dismantled as an impediment to business interests. If the principals in those other jurisdictions do not lend their legal apparatuses to us, their children will never know anything even remotely approximating human liberty. Make sure they understand the stakes.
Develop a framework for the prosecution of 9-11 criminals. Perhaps model it after the Nuremberg Trials. It is unclear whether 9-11 Crimes Tribunal derives its authority from some political body or by virtue of its own operation. We're in a legal and political no man's land. This is one for the ages, so get it right. It must stand up to scrutiny of future generations.
I imagine there to be several punishments, the gravest being death.
I will perform any executions. The manner will be a single 12-gauge shotgun blast to the forehead. It's quick, painless, and humane.
Figure it out.
I would like someone to secure for me a wife for the purpose of bearing and raising my children and keeping my house.
These are the qualifications:
Aside from participating in our children's conception, I will not necessarily want too many more carnal dealings with her.
Attempts at conception will begin upon public engagement. Should conception not prove fruitful, no marriage will occur.
I will honor my wife and provide her with emotional and material comfort to her final days.
I will, to the greatest extent practicable, defer to her judgment within her sphere, but I retain final authority over my family.
There shall be no divorce.
I know this all seems a bit old-fashioned. This is in no way sexist or objectifying, as there are many women in this world who would regard such a bargain as perfectly equitable.