Christopher King

Let's recap:

This is United States. It's dead and dying and diseased. It's fuddy duddy nonsense. It's a fond memory, long since departed:

This is the youth oriented hip hop culture of beauty and life and vibrancy and non-filth:

Only senile old rejects dance the Charleston.

Why would anyone contact that parade of idiocy?

"Wikileaks made no effort to contact us about these documents -- the United States government learned from news organizations that these documents would be posted," Jones said.

"These irresponsible leaks will not impact our ongoing commitment to deepen our partnerships with Afghanistan and Pakistan; to defeat our common enemies; and to support the aspirations of the Afghan and Pakistani people."

http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0725/leaked-documents-claim-pakistans-isi-directing-afghan-insurgency/

One does not speak to a non-relevant entity. Why would those of us plugged into the youth-oriented hip hop culture confer with a disgusting, lawless, geriatrically demented mess of a bled-out assclown jurisdiction?

That abortion flies planes into buildings and mails itself anthrax and rapes and tortures. No decent person even recognizes that sickness, much less does one seeks its input on any matter.

Don't forget: In death, I only become more powerful.

To kill me means that you lose. It is a public declaration that I have won that game of chess and that your only recourse is to flip over the game board and cross your arms and pout.

It's cuckas and bones at the gentleman's game of chess. I'm sorry that you're losing.

Can you imagine the completely MASSIVE street cred I would have? I would be the first comedian to get assassinated!

I mean, I'm already a smelly ol' terriss. I just keep racking up the professional distinctions, don't I?

.

In all seriousness, I get intimations like this now and again by various means, and have for several years. I don't concern myself with them because my assassination would only serve to demonstrate to my various audiences that I was on to something.

Compare, contrast.

The United States on Sunday denounced the release of documents that allegedly show Pakistan's military spy service is guiding the Afghan insurgency, a White House official said.

"The United States strongly condemns the disclosure of classified information by individuals and organizations which could put the lives of Americans and our partners at risk, and threaten our national security," National Security Advisor James Jones said in a statement.

"Wikileaks made no effort to contact us about these documents -- the United States government learned from news organizations that these documents would be posted," Jones said.

http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0725/leaked-documents-claim-pakistans-isi-directing-afghan-insurgency/

It has been rumoured that Pearl was especially interested in any role played by the US in training or backing the ISI. Daniel Ellsberg, the former US defence department whistleblower who has accompanied Edmonds in court, has stated: "It seems to me quite plausible that Pakistan was quite involved in this ... To say Pakistan is, to me, to say CIA because ... it's hard to say that the ISI knew something that the CIA had no knowledge of." Ahmed's close relations with the CIA would seem to confirm this. For years the CIA used the ISI as a conduit to pump billions of dollars into militant Islamist groups in Afghanistan, both before and after the Soviet invasion of 1979.

W ith CIA backing, the ISI has developed, since the early 1980s, into a parallel structure, a state within a state, with staff and informers estimated by some at 150,000. It wields enormous power over all aspects of government. The case of Ahmed confirms that parts of the ISI directly supported and financed al-Qaida, and it has long been established that the ISI has acted as go-between in intelligence operations on behalf of the CIA.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/jul/22/usa.september11

Hey, Douglas: You know all those Vermont boys who are getting their brains blown out by Afghan "insurgents?" Ultimately, they're controlled by the CIA.

Is it all starting to make sense to you now, Douglas?

Do you often permit the Vermont National Guard to get their brains blown out by a CIA client intelligence agency so that those troops can guard opium fields?

The kooks and the the crazies knew all this at least five years ago. Come on in, Douglas; the water's great.

This is a re-link to the Capta Brightstick Document.

This document details that the engine component that landed on Murray Street on 9-11 was from a Pratt and Whitney JT9D-7-series engine. Neither Flight 175 nor Flight 11 carried such equipment.

I am re-linking this because the original Capta Brightstick Document search result has been disabled by Google.

Here is that document: http://ckpi.typepad.com/christopher_king/2010/01/this-is-the-capta-brightstick-document.html

Stop it with the conspiracy theories.

Remember: The first accounting is always the truth. Anything that follows is just conspiracy theory.

KGB man: MI5 agent told me that David Kelly had been ‘exterminated'

By Glen Owen
Last updated at 2:45 AM on 25th July 2010

• Comments (46)
• Add to My Stories

Dr David Kelly: A KGB spy says that the doctor was 'exterminated'

The mystery over the death of David Kelly took a further twist last night after a former KGB officer said he had evidence that the scientist did not commit suicide.

Boris Karpichkov, who worked as a Russian spy for 15 years before fleeing to Britain, has sent a dossier to Attorney General Dominic Grieve in which he claims to relay information from an ‘MI5 agent’ that Dr Kelly had been ‘exterminated’.

...

Dr Kelly was found dead in woods near his Oxfordshire home in July 2003, after the Government exposed him as the source of a BBC report questioning Tony Blair’s case for war in Iraq.

There was no full coroner’s inquest – instead, Lord Hutton chaired a public inquiry which concluded Dr Kelly died from loss of blood after slashing his left wrist with a blunt garden pruning knife.

A number of doctors have since come forward to say that the incision could not have caused his death.

Mr Karpichkov, who sought political asylum in the UK in 1998 and now has British nationality, says he met the ‘agent’, Peter Everett, on dozens of occasions while carrying out work for Mr Everett’s company Group Global Intelligence Services, which hiredex-MI5 operatives for corporate detective work and infiltration.

In the document sent to Mr Grieve, Mr Karpichkov says that during one of their meetings, two days after Dr Kelly’s body was found, Mr Everett told him that Dr Kelly had been ‘exterminated’ for his ‘reckless behaviour’.

...

‘He added that the scene where Dr Kelly’s body was found was carefully arranged and completely “washed out”, including the destruction of all fingerprints. When I asked who was behind his death, he [Mr Everett] answered indirectly, saying the “competing firm”, which I took to mean MI6.’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1297444/MI5-agent-told-Kelly-exterminated.html

I think that we are at high risk for another false-flag terror attack.

A former senior advisor to President Bill Clinton says that the only thing which can rescue Barack Obama’s increasingly tenuous grip on power as his approval figures continue to plunge is a terror attack on the scale of Oklahoma City or 9/11, another startling reminder that such events only ever serve to benefit those in authority.

Buried in a Financial Times article about Obama’s “growing credibility crisis” and fears on behalf of Democrats that they could lose not only the White House but also the Senate to Republicans, Robert Shapiro makes it clear that Obama is relying on an October surprise in the form of a terror attack to rescue his presidency.

“The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President Obama’s leadership,” said Shapiro, adding, “He has to find some way between now and November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of how he could do that.”

http://www.prisonplanet.com/top-clinton-official-only-a-terror-attack-can-save-obama.html

This attack, I think, would be bigger, longer, and uncut. These bankers need to get their asses out of a sling now that their grand schemes for a global government are on the ropes.

I suspect one of two things. One possibility is a nuclear, biological, or radiological attack on a US city. This would serve two purposes: One, to rally Americans around their president and, two, it may be used as a casus belli for an attack on Iran, which I know these bankers have been itching for.

Or the attack may take the form of an assassination attempt on the president. This would serve the purpose of providing a convenient excuse for any number of things: martial law, an attack on the enemy du jour, whatever. And if it turns out that Mister Obama is not eligible for the office of president, these bankers would likely already know that and they would know that they would have to salvage the administration prior to the entire administration's legal invalidation. These bankers thus may wish to assassinate Barack Obama as a means of installing Biden and skirting the birth issue altogether.

Allied Military Elements: See that no harm comes to Mister Obama, regardless of his legal eligibility to the office. Observe all tripwires. Keep a close eye on all usual suspects.

Senator Leahy, I have a few more questions for you.

"Go ahead."

Let us entertain for the sake of argument the idea that I'm tired of being an outlaw. I want to walk the straight and narrow. I'm a changed man. What do I have to do to be in complete compliance with the law?

"That's a secret."

So you're saying that, even if I want to be in full compliance with the law, that it is impossible to be so, is that correct?

"Yes. As you elucidated with your questioning of Attorney General Holder, we've made it legally impossible to comply with the law."

Very well. Now: Let's assume that I am a smelly ol' terriss, a legal status that confers additional, secret legal encumbrances and licenses. And we've established that it is illegal for a partner in commerce to engage in a financial transaction with a smelly ol' terriss. Is it legal for me to pay my mortgage?

"No."

How do you propose that I settle my debts?

"I don't know. It is legally impossible for you to engage in a financial transaction with some party."

Is it legal for Judge Somebody at the Windham County Something Court to auction off a house, the mortgage for which I am legally prohibited from paying?

"I don't imagine so."

Is it legal for me to pay my property taxes, even though I may wish to do so?

"No. The State of Vermont would be engaging in a financial transaction with a person in possession of secret legal encumbrances."

Is it legal for me to buy groceries?

"No."

Is it legal for me to buy seeds and fertilizer and thus to grow my own food?

"No, it is not. The vendor of those items would be guilty of engaging in a financial transaction with a smelly ol' terriss, of lending material support to you in the form of goods or services."

So how do you propose that I eat?

"I don't know. It appears that we've made it illegal for you to sustain yourself."

In your esteemed legal opinion, would you claim with a straight face that United States is anything short of a complete parade of idiocy?

"No I would not."

.

Wolf Team Alpha: I want you to intervene and stop the auctioning off of my house on Tuesday based on the reality that it is illegal for me to pay that debt. Furthermore, it appears to be illegal for anyone to bid on the house, such action being an illegal involvement in the financial affairs of a smelly ol' terriss.

Come again?

Bless his heart. I'm happy for him.

But what the eff does it take to get an entertainment career around here?

NEW YORK -- Justin Bieber will guest star in the upcoming season of "CSI: Crime Scene Investigation." 

CBS said in a statement Thursday that Bieber will play "a troubled teen who is faced with a terrible decision regarding his only brother." He'll make his "CSI" debut on the season premiere scheduled for Sept. 23.

The network didn't say how many episodes will include the 16-year-old teen pop sensation, but called his character's plot line "an emotional story that will conclude later in the season."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/23/AR2010072301771.html

I can sing, I can dance. I'm good with the ladies. You got your international intrigue, assassination plots, wiretapped phones, the whole shebang.

I got the full entertainment monty. What's not to like?

In preparation for moving, I have an old TV I need to get rid of.

It's probably too late to put an ad in the paper, though.

Hmm...

Attorney General Holder? Would you do me a favor? Let's pretend that this is a federal investigation. Task the Vermont State Police to investigate a report of a free TV at Chris King's house. I'm pretty sure they'll have their wives in the Women's Auxiliary immediately inform the townspeople that there's a free TV at my house.

That's the best way of disseminating secret information: Just tell the Vermont State Police about it.

So the point is,

if you interview those "news" "professionals" who called the collapse of Building Seven before it happened, they will tell you where they got that information.

And if you trace that back, I think you will find that it leads back to our favorite little criminal, Michael Chertoff, who --if I am not mistaken-- was in charge of some kind of emergency response that day.

It's all so convenient that that little criminal seems to be at the epicenter of all things murderous and base.

I took a quick look at this rogue's gallery and it seems about right. Here's your criminals, right here:

http://www.whodidit.org/cocon.html

You remember Flight 93, don't you?

Flight 93 was the one that the heroic passengers drove into the ground at Shanksville and killed themselves because they were so concerned about America being Number One and everything.

Flight 93 is also the plane that had no bodies recovered from the impact site. It's also the plane whose debris was scattered over miles, as if it had been shot out of the sky by an air-to-air missile, likely by one of those interceptors whose missiles had been removed so that those interceptors could be part of another drill that conveniently had been scheduled for September 11th, 2001.

Those interceptors thus had to return to their base, get their missiles, then pursue "Flight 93."

"Flight 93" was a drone, just like Flights 175 and 11.

Flight 93 was destined for Building Seven.

According to the Pentagon's grand plan, all three principle buildings at the World Trade Center were to have been hit by planes. Then, on schedule, according to a predetermined timeline, those three buildings were to have been collapsed with their pre-placed demolitions charges.

Everything was supposed to go off according to a pre-planned schedule.

But "Flight 93" got shot down by a patriotic pilot who wasn't in on the scam. This screwed up Larry Silverstein's profitable urban renewal project. That's why he was on the phone to his insurance company inquiring whether they would pay out if it turned out that the building "needed" to be pulled.

You will note that it takes weeks to wire a building up for demolition. Why would Larry Silverstein be on the phone that very day to his insurance carrier? Couldn't he wait a day? Thoroughly inspect the building and see if it needed demolishing? No, he was on the phone to his insurance carrier to see if they would cover a controlled demolition because there was now a kink in the plan: "Flight 93" got shot down.

So he had to think real fast. "Ah!," he says, "I, uh, decided to, uh, pull it because of the tremendous loss of life and how it's so tear jerking." So that's why he called his insurance carrier, don't you see?

But this delay caused the pre-disseminated timeline to the "news" media to be off by some tens of minutes while the criminals figured out how to explain away the collapse of a building that had not received its airplane.

And that's why the "news" media called the collapse of Building Seven while it still stood --they were working from the original script, unaware that the timeline was now screwed up.

And there you have it. I bet you a day's pay that I'm right.

I can't lay off the 9-11 material, but the least I can do is to ask the majority of my audience to ignore it.

Any further 9-11 material is for the shit-stained stable boys in the Pentagon.

Hey, Mullen: This was a missile, wasn't it? That explains the corkscrew exhaust, doesn't it?

If I tried hard enough, I bet I could determine precisely which make and model of missile it was.

And here is Fox "News" getting in on the act, too.

Once you understand that the United States military cannot  win a war against goat herders, and once you understand that that guild has no greater honor than would be required to till soil in the cultivation of opium for their banker masters, you can see that once they have decided to fly drones into buildings, they will also proactively disseminate the "cover story," the propaganda version of events, according to a predetermined timeline.

The timeline got messed up, which is why all those knowingly complicit "news" organizations called the collapse of Building Seven before it happened.

So not only can the Pentagon not win a war against goat herders without running home with their tails between their legs, and not only can they not execute a simple false-flag event without leaving a 7-series compressor on Murray Street for all to see, they're simply too stupid even to get the timeline right.

The United States military officer corps is the most feckless, incompetent, dishonorable bunch of goofs I have ever encountered. (I would be in a position to know.)

Take it from me: At no time is a United States military officer to be trusted on any matter. They're snakes.

CNN is not known for news. It is unclear to me why they're speaking.

Should there be a “gatekeeper” regulating internet bloggers? In the aftermath of the Shirley Sherrod incident, that’s what CNN promoted on July 23.

 

Anchors Kyra Phillips and John Roberts discussed the “mixed blessing of the internet,” and agreed that there should be a crackdown on anonymous bloggers who disparage others on the internet.

 

“There are so many great things that the internet does and has to offer, but at the same time, Kyra, as you know, there is this dark side,” Roberts said. “Imagine what would have happened if we hadn’t taken a look at what happened with Shirley Sherrod and plumbed the depths further and found out that what had been posted on the internet was not in fact reflective of what she said.”

 

But Phillips replied that the mainstream media “can’t always do that.”

 

“There’s going to have be a point in time where these people have to be held accountable,” Phillips said. “How about all these bloggers that blog anonymously? They say rotten things about people and they’re actually given credibility, which is crazy. They’re a bunch of cowards, they’re just people seeking attention.”

http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2010/20100723171950.aspx

CNN is a propaganda outlet. If anything needs to be shut down around here, it's CNN. Why, CNN even played a propaganda role in 9-11. CNN was reading from the same disinformation script that BBC was reading from on 9-11. But the timeline for the stage show got screwed up. Someone missed their cue and both news outlets called the collapse of Building Seven some tens of minutes before it happened.

Watch these mass murderers in action:

(You'll notice that Building Seven is clearly standing in the background, yet "is collapsing or has collapsed." It is structurally impossible for a steel-framed building to collapse from a hydrocarbon fire, but no matter.)

And here are some mass murderers at BBC, calling the same collapse while the building is plainly standing:

No no no. Stop. Remember: The first story out of the gates is always the truth. Everything that challenges that story is a conspiracy theory.

Reporting from Seoul —

The way U.S. officials see it, there's little mystery behind the most notorious shipwreck in recent Korean history.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton calls the evidence "overwhelming" that the Cheonan, a South Korean warship that sank in March, was hit by a North Korean torpedo. Vice President Joe Biden has cited the South Korean-led panel investigating the sinking as a model of transparency.

But challenges to the official version of events are coming from an unlikely place: within South Korea.

...

The critics, mostly but not all from the opposition, say it is unlikely that the impoverished North Korean regime could have pulled off a perfectly executed hit against a superior military power, sneaking a submarine into the area and slipping away without detection. They also wonder whether the evidence of a torpedo attack was misinterpreted, or even fabricated.

"I couldn't find the slightest sign of an explosion," said Shin Sang-chul, a former shipbuilding executive-turned-investigative journalist. "The sailors drowned to death. Their bodies were clean. We didn't even find dead fish in the sea."

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-korea-torpedo-20100724,0,1827085.story

General relativity is a conspiracy theory. The universe is still made of rocks thrown into the air by the wolf god. The sun is his chariot.

Lead in dinnerware is still good for you. Only weirdos think otherwise.

People spring fully formed from the mud.

All else is a conspiracy theory, because it all came after. AFTER. See? If a thing comes after something, the first thing is true and the second thing is just because you want to eat someone or you're a hater.

Stop being so kookie with your conspiracy theories that incorporate some newfangled "knowledge" or additional data. Data must never be added. All things are frozen in time, like a bee in amber. You must NEVER reopen a settled issue.

Stupid.

As we know, my house is to be auctioned off on Tuesday.

I have every means of paying for this house, except that certain dead jurisdictions made it illegal for me to earn a living because I am doing their own law enforcement jobs.

Attorney General Holder: You will assign one senior member of the Department of Justice to drive to Bellows Falls to attend the auction as a witness to your handiwork. (Not the local guy. Put a little effort into it, okay?)

President Obama: You will assign one senior member of your administration to drive to Bellows Falls to attend the auction as a witness to your handiwork.

Actually, scrap the space plane thing tonight.

It will be too low for me to see it. I've got trees to the south of me.

I'll let you know of a better time.

Thanks,

Chris

Military peeps:

"Satellite Flybys" turns your Android phone into an indispensable, field-tested satellite watching tool. It tells you when spacecraft are about to appear (with a countdown clock!) and which direction you should face. It also cuts through much confusion. There are tens of thousands of spacecraft and pieces of debris in Earth orbit. "Satellite flybys" tells you only about the most interesting and newsworthy objects. Satellite selections are made by Dr. Tony Phillips of spaceweather.com and the list of tracked objects is updated and changed as things happen in the night sky.

http://simpleflybys.com/android/

I found that application advertised on spaceweather.com, which is a cool site about sunspots and all that. (There may be northern lights tonight up north here, so keep an eye out.)

So I downloaded the application and installed it on my phone. It's really cool. It'll tell you the precise times of a particular orbiting body's flyover, as well as its projected location in the night sky. And it gives interesting information. You can set a reminder for any particular flyover and your phone will remind you to go outside and look.

For example, the secret X-37B space plane, which is reported to be a low-earth orbit, unmanned spy plane, will be flying over tonight starting at 10:15pm. Do me a favor? I'll go outside with my binoculars and look at the space plane. Have it flash a light or something when it's highest over my location, okay? I'll give a for-real salute and you can take a picture if you want. I'll be standing in the road that runs right outside my front door. If you want, you can ring my phone twice just to let me know to get ready to salute.

Let's do something fun!

You can talk to me.

I do not recommend that my personal friends or associates talk to me this way because certain assclown jurisdictions (who wouldn't know the first thing about law) might make YOU a smelly ol' terriss too!

Senator Leahy.

I trust that you've heard Attorney General Holder's testimony.

"I have."

Mister Holder has affirmed, in his legal opinion, that it is theoretically impossible for me to know the law.

Is it illegal for someone to hire a smelly ol' terriss?

"The Patriot Act forbids such a thing. That would constitute lending financial assistance to a smelly ol' terriss."

Since it is illegal for me to work, how do you propose that I earn a living?

"I don't know."

Would United States likely prosecute itself for lending financial assistance to its own declared enemy, a smelly ol' terriss, the presumption being, of course, that it would never employ a smelly ol' terriss in the first place?

"Of course not. How could United States prosecute itself for a thing whose legality is unknowable because it's secret?"

So, essentially, United States has made it illegal for me to work for any entity other than United States. Is that correct?

"Absolutely."

Within one week your jurisdiction will secure for me a position with an annual salary of one hundred thousand dollars. I am now an employee of United States. It is illegal for me to earn a living otherwise. My upkeep is now your jurisdiction's responsibility. And you can put the thought right out of your head that I will ever show up anywhere or perform a single bit of actual work. I have the moral authority to command that your jurisdiction provide me a paycheck. I similarly possess the moral authority to define the job description, which conveniently is nothing. How do you like that? Those are the stinking fruits of your jurisdiction's foul labors. I hope you all enjoyed your secret kook law while it lasted.

Furthermore, your office will file suit against United States for damages amounting to the total I am owed in outstanding ticket receipts, that sum being the total number of audience members in my show --by whatever communications system my show may be retransmitted on-- multiplied by $100 per person, multiplied by four years.

You are dismissed. Thank you.

Before I dismiss you, Mister Holder, I should like to examine this nuthouse kook law a bit further.

We've established that there are additional legal encumbrances associated with being a smelly ol' terriss. And we've established that I do not possess the security clearance to know if I have been designated a smelly ol' terriss. So we can conclude that the reasonable man is legally prohibited from knowing the law. Am I required to pay federal income tax?

"It's not possible for you to know. Those additional secret legal encumbrances of the terriss may, for all you know, be accompanied by secret legal allowances. In our kook thinking, maybe we've made smelly ol' terriss exempt from the federal income tax."

Can I find out what those secret legal allowances are, the allowances that may accompany the secret legal encumbrances in your kook law?

"No. It's Top Secret."

So I may have been exempted from all sorts of things. Maybe you've granted the smelly ol' terriss legal license to sprout wings and fly, is that correct?

"Yup. Who knows what sorts of licenses and allowances and encumbrances we've got hidden away in our kook law."

Is it theoretically possible for your jurisdiction to prosecute me on any matter, as it is now theoretically impossible for me to know what legal licenses I may have been granted, as it is theoretically impossible to know if I'm been designated a smelly ol' terriss?

"No. It is not theoretically possible to prosecute you on any matter, because it is not theoretically possible for you to know the law. You cannot know what secret legal licenses you may have been extended."

So since you can prosecute me on no matter, it follows then that no United States law touches me. Is that correct?

[whispered, mumbled:] "yezmmnsdsgdggbsdhs."

I'm sorry. Could you speak louder? Does any United States law touch me?

"No. No United States law touches you for so many reasons, the most recently examined of which being that we can't prosecute you on any matter because you cannot know if we have extended secret legal licenses to you in addition to any secret legal encumbrances."

So since yours is the Typhoid Mary of jurisdictions, and since unlawfulness corrupts all jurisdictions through which it may pass, and since it is legal for a smelly ol' terriss to use force to prevent one's arrest by any who may deliver him to our delightful kook jurisdiction, that means that no jurisdiction can enforce so much as a parking ticket, is that correct?

"That is the unfortunate, yet completely rational, conclusion that the reasonable man would reach, yes. It appears that no jurisdiction can lay a sanction upon you because you cannot know if your arrest will lead to certain torture and death. Not to mention that you cannot be aware of any secret legal licenses you may have been granted in addition to secret legal encumbrances."

So you're saying that, because of the corrosive legal effect that United States has upon the ability of the several states to lay sanction, and because I cannot know of any secret legal licenses I may have been granted, that no law of the several states touches me. Is that correct?

"That is arguably extremely correct. Unlawfulness corrupts all jurisdictions through which it may pass. And for all you know, we've extended to you secret legal licenses."

In your opinion, does any state law touch me, if no sanction can be laid and if I cannot know what legal licenses I may have been extended?

"No. It is not theoretically possible for you to know what constitutes a crime, since you cannot know what secret legal licenses you've been granted."

So since no sanction can be laid upon me by United States or by the several states, I'd say I am touched by the law of no man, is that correct?

"Yes. It appears that you are correct. You are, as you've stated all along, a sovereign being, subject to the rule of no man."

Was that secret law of yours really such a bright idea after all?

"No, Chris, it most certainly was not. We accidentally made it legal for you to ignore all federal and state laws."

Thank you. That will be all.

Mister Holder, I have one more question.

"Go ahead. I like these!"

As part of that government/citizen compact, the reasonable man may be expected to readily deliver himself into custody should the government demand it, that reasonable man having no fear of arguing his case in court, is that correct?

"Mm hm. That's the strength of our legal system. Every man gets his day in court to demonstrate his innocence. If you're innocent then you've nothing to fear."

Do terriss get trials?

"Of course not. They're the worse o' the worse. They're too dangerous."

Am I a smelly ol' terriss?

"I can't tell you. Like I said, it's a secret."

Do you reserve to yourselves the right to torture terriss?

"Yup."

Would I face torture if arrested?

"That would depend on whether you've been declared a terriss, which, again, is Top Secret."

So I cannot know if I would ever see the light of day if I permit myself to be arrested, and I may face torture, is that right?

"That is correct."

Would you expect the reasonable man to permit himself to be taken into custody so that he might later be tortured and killed?

"Of course not. That's kookie. What reasonable man would allow himself to be tortured and killed?"

Exactly. Does it then become reasonable for that man to use all most minimally effective degrees of force, up to and including lethal force, to prevent his own arrest, knowing as he does, that he faces torture and death?

"Mm hm."

So if the reasonable man may use lethal force to prevent his arrest on any matter, how do you propose to enforce your laws?

"I don't know. We didn't think it through."

All law is composed of a legal proscription attached to a defined sanction. And where there is no punishment there can be no crime. So if you can mete out no punishment --by already having invited the reasonable man to use all necessary force to prevent his arrest-- then all legal proscriptions become detached from any sanction, is that correct?

"Yup. I think I know where you're going with this and I don't much care for it."

If you deny trial and if you reserve to yourselves the right to torture and kill without trial, you deliver to the reasonable man permission to use lethal force to prevent his arrest on any matter. And where there is no sanction there is no law. So do you have any laws now?

"Nope. I was afraid you were going to figure that out. The United States now lacks a body of law."

That was easy. I have now demonstrated to the court that the United States stands mute on any legal matter. It retired its entire body of law by inviting the reasonable man to use lethal force to prevent his arrest on any matter. Pure brilliance.

On a related matter, Mister Holder, if United States grants permission to the reasonable man to use force to prevent his arrest --by that jurisdiction's reserving to itself the right to torture and imprison without trial-- how shall that reasonable man regard other jurisdictions, knowing that the several states will deliver to United States a person named in an arrest warrant?

"Well, since United States reserves to itself the right to torture, imprison, and kill without trial, and since we've already established that it is perfectly legal to use lethal force to prevent one's arrest on any matter, it is, by extension, legal to use lethal force to prevent one's arrest by any of our partner law enforcement agencies. They would be executing a United States arrest warrant in delivering you to us, and we would torture you and kill you."

So your jurisdiction has actually made it legal to use lethal force to prevent one's arrest by any jurisdiction that may deliver one to United States, is that correct?

"Mm hm. And we went to law school to figure out how to do that."

Yours is just the Typhoid Mary of jurisdictions, isn't it?

.

Though I wish no one any harm, I suggest that the state Attorneys General cock their heads and closely examine this kook jurisdiction that they've elected to associate themselves with. Because if you study the legal ramifications of working with that kook jurisdiction, you will find that the lawless behavior of United States has now made it legal to use lethal force against state law enforcement officers to prevent one's arrest on any matter.

...because the alternative is certain torture and death. It's a straight-up self-defense issue. The defense would be a cakewalk.

It's pure legal brilliance around here, isn't it?

Attorney General Holder?

"Yes, Chris."

What's the law today?

"What do you mean?"

I mean, there has to be some maxim of law that states that if government is to expect adherence to its laws that the reasonable man must have some means of knowing what those laws are, right?

"Most definitely. It would be kookie to expect otherwise. How could a non-kook expect someone to follow a law that may or may not exist?"

Exactly. Now: I have a strong suspicion that I am smelly ol' terriss. That legal status lends to one additional legal encumbrances. So that I might conduct myself lawfully, I should like to know what those additional legal encumbrances are. Am I a smelly ol' terriss with additional legal encumbrances?

"I can't tell you. It's a secret. That's the beauty of it."

So if it's a secret, then how is it legally possible for me to follow the law?

"I don't know. That's your problem."

Let's say that I wish to exchange a gold coin for a product or service. I will remind you that United States gold coins are lawful money under the Constitution. Will I be getting this partner in commerce in trouble for paying with lawful money?

"That depends on whether you've been declared a smelly ol' terriss. The Patriot Act makes accepting a gold coin from a smelly ol' terriss a crime."

So that I might not get anyone else in trouble, I would like to know if I am a terriss. Am I?

"I can't tell you. Like I said, it's a secret."

Is it legally possible for an employer to pay me for services rendered without that employer running afoul of the law?

"That depends on whether you're a terriss. If you're a terriss, yes; it would be a crime for that employer to hire you. But if you're not a terriss, he's okay."

Am I terriss?

"That's classified."

Do I possess the security clearance to know?

"No."

So that means that there is an entire collection of legal encumbrances that I may be subject to, the precise nature of which I cannot know, is that right?

"Yes."

So it is thus theoretically impossible to know the law. And since it is not possible to follow a law whose nature is unknown, your jurisdiction legally forbids following the law, is that correct?

"Bingo! You've been fast-tracked through law school, Chris. You've discovered our secret. My brilliance jurisdiction has made it illegal to follow the law. ...Enjoy!"

.

The United States government has now made it illegal to follow its own laws. Furthermore, it is unclear to me whether I can legally work or legally communicate with friends. I may be placing friends and employers into legal jeopardy.

That is an idiot jurisdiction is there ever was one. Is it any wonder that I completely ignore that funhouse of idiocy?