This Room Seats Fifty

You know, folks...

I'm happy that everyone is jockeying for position and trying to make things as comfortable as possible for their own people. I understand that. But, uh, if you run these gaming strategies all the way through the simulator --and when you factor in the lethality of modern weapons-- you see that it results in the destruction of the planet.

In non-technical terms, the planet is the thing we live on.

You people --and I mean every last person in my audience-- are really something else. You can't see past the nose on your own face, can you? Do you people even have brains? Is your species destined for annihilation?

There is a gaming strategy that provides for everyone's needs, with none to rule over any other.

But then there's this:

SEVEN of the Mumbai terrorists were British Pakistanis, Indian government sources claimed last night.

Insiders said two Brits had been arrested and another five suspects were from the UK.

Two of the seven are from Leeds, one is from Bradford and one is from Hartlepool, it was alleged.

Sources claim the Hartlepool suspect was found in the Taj Mahal Palace hotel, where gunmen massacred dozens of guests.

The man from Bradford and one of the men from Leeds were allegedly discovered on the 17th floor of the Trident-Oberoi Hotel.

The second Leeds man was said to have been captured near a jetty after the 25-strong terror gang landed by speedboat.

Documents found on the suspects confirmed they were British, the sources said.

Other reports said Indian officials checked Blackberry phones used by the gang to follow news reports and found "a lot of content" linked to the UK.

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/2008/11/29/mumbai-attacks-seven-terrorists-were-british-claims-indian-government-86908-20932992/

Are there decoys here? Is this true? What precisely were they doing? I know that American, British, and Israeli intelligence all work together; they are all in the employ of central bankers --the same people who commissioned 9-11 and the Financial Attack of 2008. (Babylonian) mysteries abound.

One thing is for sure: Just as you may safely ignore the word of the US Government Man, you may safely ignore the word of the UK Government Man. Their credibility is zero.

Data point

The role that Nariman House is coming to play in this entire attack drama, is puzzling. Last night, residents ordered close to 100 kilograms of meat and other food, enough to feed an army or a bunch of people for twenty days. Shortly thereafter, the ten odd militants moved in, obviously, indicating that the food and meat was ordered, keeping their visit in mind, another cop added.
 
" One of the militants called up a television news channel and voiced his demands today, but, interestingly, when he was asked where are they all holed him, he said at the Israeli owned Nariman House and they are six of them here", one of the investigating cops said. Since morning, there has been exchange of gun fire has been going on and the militants seem well equipped to counter the cops fire. To top it, they have food and shelter. One wonders of they have the support of the residents, a local Ramrao Shanker said.
 
Cops did not want to go  into speculation. "Three residents of the building, all presumably Israeli residents, have also been killed since last night, allegedly by the militants. We do not have their identity and would not like to speculate on this angle", the cops said.

http://www.mid-day.com/news/2008/nov/281108-Nariman-House-terror-hub.htm

That Nariman House is the Mumbai headquarters of Chabad Lubavitch ultra-orthodox Jews.

I'm not too sure about what they believe, and I never really wanted to get my correspondence degree in Judaic Studies to begin with. (It's a bad career move.) But I suspect that they think everyone is worth less than their little fingernail. They appear to share a chauvinistic, hate-based worldview, much like those adherents of the Hindutva. (If I'm getting a proper feel for Hindutva at this preliminary juncture of my forensic investigation.) They may be two peas in a pod.

This is all starting to make sense. We've got orthodox Jews involved in 9-11 (Chertoff in particular.) And we've got ultra-orthodox Jews in Mumbai, just leaning up against a tree, cleaning their nails and whistling, possibly hosting the assailants, their brethren calling the entire affair "India's 9-11."

Methinks they looooove 9-11's and chaos. What did Rahm Emmanual say? Something along the lines of, "Don't let good chaos go to waste"? (And, presumably, if there is insufficient to be found, make some.)

There is so much chaos around. Whoever shall be the Lord of Chaos in this drama?

Data point

It is interesting to note that Gandhi recognized the actions of the Zionists in the 1940s as "terrorism." On January 31, 1948 barely months later, a man by the name Nathuram Godse shot Gandhi and committed one of the centuries most heinous political assassinations. Nathuram Godse was a committed member of the RSS or Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, the mother organization of the present day BJP, Bharatiya Janata Party. The organization though banned after the assassination of Gandhi, continued to grow in strength partly due to the lukewarm opposition to its activities by the upper caste dominated leadership of the Congress rulers, which used communal and religious strife to attack popular dissent in regions such as Tamil Nadu, Punjab, Assam and Kashmir during its fifty odd dynastic years in power.

http://www.geocities.com/virodhi2001/IndiaResistance2001.htm

There appears to be a history of association between Israeli Zionists (weaponizers of Talmudism) and an Indian opposition group who are adherents of Hindutva.

Interesting read.

This Mumbai event appears to have the goal of destabilizing the Indian government.

Pakistan does not appear to have anything to do with it. It would not benefit.

Stand down your outrage and identify the real culprit before you all go off half-cocked. Those two nations are walking into a trap.

Data point

With a traumatized nation and a paralyzed government, a core group of secular ideologues and Hindu nationalists are executing a ‘soft coup’ in New Delhi to bring to power hawks who want to pursue America’s agenda of grooming India as a regional policeman, sort out Pakistan and confront China. India will self-destroy in the process. India’s military and intelligence has been penetrated. The man who uncovered the plot, Hemant Karkare, the antiterrorism chief of Mumbai police, was the first target of the mysterious terrorists. Patriotic Indians need to wake up and save their country.

http://www.ahmedquraishi.com/latest_col.php?id=78

Let's say that the New York Times performed an economically useful function.

...which it does not.

But if it were to perform an economically useful function, it would sell information that might provide the greatest return to the purchaser of it.

As it stands now, the New York Times will not sell information that would compromise the economic standing of its owners and advertisers. This is why they do not cover the false-flag event known as 9-11. This is why I am pleased to see it go bankrupt.

But information related to the false-flag event known as 9-11 has tremendous economic value. That information is worth money. I employed information from, among others, Prison Planet and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth in formulating my attack on the very notion of territorial jurisdiction. I employed that information to destroy the United States' and the several states' claims to territorial exclusivity.

So henceforth, no other jurisdiction has a claim, for example, on any of my earnings. I owe no jurisdiction a tax on my income. And I never will.

Not a single person in my audience would claim with a straight face that I am touched by the laws of any other jurisdiction. The matter is settled.

This is worth money. Especially if I manage to make an entertainment career for myself, I will save a great deal of money on income tax and property tax. This is what happens when no one follows the law.

Information regarding 9-11 has tremendous economic value. This is why you will never see a word of it in the New York Times.

This is also why Mark Weitzman of the Simon Wiesenthal Center says that Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have a lampshade factory in their cellar. See, because if Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth is correct, that information will cost Mark Weitzman's clan a great deal of moral standing and, thus, money and power.

Once you strip away all the ostentatious sobbing and the hand-wringing and the beating of funeral drums, everything in this world comes down to one consideration alone: money.

I am not a sentimental person. I apologize if I seem unmoved by everyone's best efforts at sentimentality. I didn't fall off the turnip truck yesterday.

Knowledge is power. Knowledge is money.

Journalists: Convert your information into a form that allows people to save or make money. If you do this, you will thrive.

It's a Twofer Tuesday on Q104 the Queer.

What I break I must replace.

So here goes.

The newspaper industry is dead. We all know that.

I lament this because I have several friends who work in the print and television news business. I don't like to see people lose their jobs.

Newspapers have several audiences. So they must perform several functions. And some of these functions subsidize others. The classifieds and the sudoku games subsidize the stories up front.

The issues are these: declining readership and declining ad revenue. You will eventually move exclusively online, so you must operate within that sphere.

The solution: Choose an audience. Pick only one. Do you want to be in the picture game business (and there's nothing wrong with that,) or do you want to be in the news business? In the future, content providers will provide either picture games or they will provide news. They will not do both.

I suspect that in the future, writers will be primarily freelance. They will sell their content to an agency. For this purpose, I suspect that a sort of writer co-op may be formed, to handle the selling of content.

The world is full of the shuffling undead. They think that everything is free. Stop giving it away. A larger audience is not necessarily better.

Properly executed, there would be no news on the internet except for that which is encrypted, which employs some form of digital rights management scheme. If I want to watch Quincy, it is not (for the most part) just available for free somewhere. I have to pay Netflix to watch it. Netflix employs a digital rights management scheme.

If the shuffling undead want news, let them pay for it. Joe Blow writer is a member of Journalists R Us. Journalists R Us handles selling his content. Joe Blow is an expert in intelligence matters. He has a following who trust his judgment. Journalists R Us contracts with One Stop News Co. One Stop News Co has a website that delivers all sorts of stuff: sports, politics, fashion, whatever. The shuffling undead may not view this content without paying for it. With a subscription, the paying user is permitted to view the content. It can't even be copied and pasted. (There ought to be a feature in the news-reader software that permits the excerpting of a certain number of words for fair-use purposes, for the use of bloggers. But the clicker can't view the full article without being a paying subscriber of One Stop News Co.)

The technical solution is easy.

The newspaper WILL go out of business. ...unless it turns itself into One Stop News Co and employs digital rights management to protect its content.

Though the newspaper will go out of business, the journalist will forever have a job; the world needs information. Information and analysis has economic value because the economic actor will forever need it in order to make economic (and political) decisions. Stop giving the information away.

I purchased a subscription to the New York Times a year or two ago. They had protected some of their content. Good. Smart. I ponied up my thirty bucks or whatever. I bought the subscription solely for the purpose of reading that Red Shoed Maureen Dowd and that Theater Guy Turned Political Commentarist Frank Rich. (Being conversant in the methods of theater, he understands politics perfectly. It is economically useful that I read him. It is not economically useful that I read the tripe up front about what the Government Man said.)

But now the Times is giving it away again.

So:

If you are a journalist or a columnist, do this:

• Pick a specialty. Become an expert in that field and concern yourself with nothing else. An intelligence analyst will never trouble himself to write an article on food. In the future, you will not be tasked with a project. You will produce what you think is economically useful within your field of expertise and you will sell it.
• All you journalists band together and form your clearinghouse. This clearinghouse contracts with news sites.
• Or you journalists can hire software guys to create for you a news website called One Stop News Co, complete with digital rights management. And if some other news organization wishes to use the news they find on One Stop News Co, their commercial subscription to One Stop News Co permits them to reference it.

There's your solution. Do not play to the shuffling undead. Allow them to fully realize the cost of being uninformed.

The newsreader software that the subscriber uses should treat the information not as text, but as video, say. You need a computer expert to help you figure out a way to apply digital rights management to your content. Because as it stands right now, things are too easily copied and pasted and forwarded and linked.

Now let's say that One Stop News Co has an agreement with a competitor by the name of News Land. If a News Land subscriber comes across a link to a story, a story that is owned by One Stop News Co, that News Land subscriber can read it because his computer has a cookie on it or whatever that tells the One Stop News Co server that he is a subscriber in good standing with News Land, an outfit with which One Stop News Co has a content sharing agreement.

The point is, a Gold Level subscriber --and a Gold Level news subscriber like me should expect to pay several hundred dollars per year for news-- will be able to view all or most of what he clicks through to. And the Bronze Level news subscriber --who pays fifty bucks a year-- gets the cucka news. The garbage. Transcripts of what the Government Man said today.

Smart people know what things are worth and they are willing to pay for them. Make them pay for it. They will pay for it.

The shuffling undead are not relevant. Ignore them. So what if they can't read your story? All they can do is grunt and smear fecal coliform all over the place anyway.

Furthermore,

that the New York Times just reprints whatever anyone tells them is evidence that they have no idea how intelligence services work. In these matters, the New York Times is worse than useless.

I give you another year before you're on the auction block. Useless. You can't even break the 9-11 story.

"Wheeeee!!!!! Look at me, everyone! I'm flying through the air! In the city that never sleeps!!!! I jumped right out of this building because it was so hot in there!!!! And my guts will splatter all over the ground!!!! Maybe the New York Times will come to the rescue and cover their own material for once!!!!"

There is a woman who reserves two papers each day at the gas station. We keep them under the counter for her. They are the New York Times and the Rutland Herald. (Both useless. The Rutland Herald doesn't even respond to requests to buy full-page ads. They must be swimming in ad revenue.) I commit my own brand of theft of service by reading the Times for free. I read the following sections: Arts, Style, Business, and Science.

I don't even read the front section of the paper.

I read the New York Times to see what people are wearing. That's about it. The New York Times is People Magazine for those who fancy themselves brilliant and urbane.

The New York Times is not where I get my politics information. It's cucka doodie level. College post-grads who stroke their beards read the New York Times and think it just the height of sophistication.

If I want to know what the Government Man thinks (which I don't) I will listen to him on TV. There is no reason to read your newspaper. That is why you will be out of business within one year. You do not provide an economically useful function.

You want to know how to do it right? Go to, for example, antiwar.com. Not only do they aggregate news, but they provide expert analysis. I donate an average of one hundred dollars per year for the privilege of reading their site. That is something I am willing to pay for.

The greatest mass murder in American history happens on your watch and you do nothing.

Please hasten your bankruptcy by any means necessary.

You will ignore all thoughts of United States agents on the matter.

American intelligence and counterterrorism officials said Friday that there was mounting evidence that a Pakistani militant group based in Kashmir, most likely Lashkar-e-Taiba, was responsible for this week’s deadly attacks in Mumbai.

The officials cautioned that they had reached no firm conclusions about who was responsible for the attacks, or how they were planned and carried out. Nevertheless, they said that evidence gathered in the past two days pointed to a role for Lashkar-e-Taiba or possibly another group based in Kashmir, Jaish-e-Muhammad, which also has a track record of attacks against India.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/us-intelligence-focuses-on-pakistani-group.html

Standards have slipped around here. Why, America's best intelligence minds can't even explain how burning Met-Rx bars and copy paper on the seventieth floor of the World Trade Center caused molten lava in the basement.

If the Government Man is speaking, it is a lie. Move on.